On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:13:38 +0200, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:14:43PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of returning 0 for all errors, allow the precise error
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:14:43PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of returning 0 for all errors, allow the precise error code to
be propagated. This will be used in subsequent patches to allow further
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of returning 0 for all errors, allow the precise error code to
be propagated. This will be used in subsequent patches to allow further
propagation of error codes.
The interrupt number corresponding to the
Instead of returning 0 for all errors, allow the precise error code to
be propagated. This will be used in subsequent patches to allow further
propagation of error codes.
The interrupt number corresponding to the new mapping is returned in an
output parameter so that the return value is reserved
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:24:46PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
For the MIPS bits:
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org
Ralf
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
