On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>> In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC
>> and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
>> difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
>> of years. Th
In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for
PowerPC
and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
of years. This patch renames both to simply .phandle.
Note: the .node also exist
From: Grant Likely
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:01:14 -0700
> In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC
> and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
> difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
> of years. This pa
In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC
and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
of years. This patch renames both to simply .phandle.
Note: the .node also existed
