On 09/01/2020 03:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
[ 17.080644] [ cut here ]
[ 17.081342] kernel BUG at mm/pgtable-generic.c:164!
[ 17.082091] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 17.082977] Modules linked in:
[ 17.08348
[ 17.080644] [ cut here ]
[ 17.081342] kernel BUG at mm/pgtable-generic.c:164!
[ 17.082091] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 17.082977] Modules linked in:
[ 17.083481] CPU: 79 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
5.9.0-rc2-00105-
On 09/01/2020 12:08 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 9:11 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
>>
>> It really makes sense to classify these tests here as static and dynamic.
>> Sta
On 9/1/20 9:11 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
It really makes sense to classify these tests here as static and dynamic.
Static are the ones that test via page table entry values modification
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
It really makes sense to classify these tests here as static and dynamic.
Static are the ones that test via page table entry values modification
without changing anything on the actual page
This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 52 ---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
index 0ce5c6a24c5b..78c
