On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:22:25PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:47:54AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:14:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> >On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:10:20PM +1100, Dav
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:47:54AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:14:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:10:20PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:03:59PM +1100, G
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:14:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:10:20PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:03:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +1100, Dav
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:10:20PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:03:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +1100, Gavi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:10:20PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:03:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39:45PM +1100,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:03:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39:45PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >> >On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:58:45AM +110
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39:45PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> >On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:58:45AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39:45PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:58:45AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR)
> >> to inject the specified EEH error, wh
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39:45PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:58:45AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR)
>> to inject the specified EEH error, which is represented by
>> (struct vfio_eeh_pe_err), to the indicated
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:58:45AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR)
> to inject the specified EEH error, which is represented by
> (struct vfio_eeh_pe_err), to the indicated PE for testing purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
Reviewed-
The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR)
to inject the specified EEH error, which is represented by
(struct vfio_eeh_pe_err), to the indicated PE for testing purpose.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
---
Documentation/vfio.txt| 12
drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_ee
11 matches
Mail list logo