Le 28/06/2020 à 18:20, Bharata B Rao a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 03:43:41PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
H_SVM_INIT_DONE incorrectly assumes that the Ultravisor has explicitly
As noted in the last iteration, can you reword the above please?
I don't see it as an incorrect assumption, but see it
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 03:43:41PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> H_SVM_INIT_DONE incorrectly assumes that the Ultravisor has explicitly
As noted in the last iteration, can you reword the above please?
I don't see it as an incorrect assumption, but see it as extension of
scope now :-)
> called
H_SVM_INIT_DONE incorrectly assumes that the Ultravisor has explicitly
called H_SVM_PAGE_IN for all secure pages. These GFNs continue to be
normal GFNs associated with normal PFNs; when infact, these GFNs should
have been secure GFNs, associated with device PFNs.
Move all the PFNs associated with
