Am 23.02.22 um 12:47 schrieb Nicholas Piggin:
Excerpts from Christian Borntraeger's message of February 23, 2022 7:14 pm:
Am 22.02.22 um 15:11 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 2/22/22 07:47, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are
happy with
Excerpts from Christian Borntraeger's message of February 23, 2022 7:14 pm:
>
>
> Am 22.02.22 um 15:11 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 2/22/22 07:47, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are
>>> happy with it (link in changelog) just waiting
Am 22.02.22 um 15:11 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 2/22/22 07:47, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are
happy with it (link in changelog) just waiting on KVM upstreaming. Do
you have objections to the series going to ppc/kvm tree first, or
Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of February 23, 2022 12:11 am:
> On 2/22/22 07:47, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are
>> happy with it (link in changelog) just waiting on KVM upstreaming. Do
>> you have objections to the series
On 2/22/22 07:47, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are
happy with it (link in changelog) just waiting on KVM upstreaming. Do
you have objections to the series going to ppc/kvm tree first, or
another option is you could take patch 3 alone
Paolo,
Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are
happy with it (link in changelog) just waiting on KVM upstreaming. Do
you have objections to the series going to ppc/kvm tree first, or
another option is you could take patch 3 alone first (it's relatively
independent of
