On 23/06/20 12:00, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/6/23 17:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 27/04/20 06:35, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>>> In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the
>>> 'kvm_vcpu'
>>> structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters
>>>
On 2020/6/23 17:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 27/04/20 06:35, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters
retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time.
On 27/04/20 06:35, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
> structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters
> retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time. This
> patch does a unified cleanup of
Paolo Bonzini, any opinion on this?
Thanks and best,
Tianjia
On 2020/4/27 12:35, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters
retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters
In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters
retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time. This
patch does a unified cleanup of these remaining redundant parameters.
This series
