On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:58:41 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for the IO TLB area.
This size can be influenced
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:08 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:58:41 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:28:09 -0500
Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:08 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:58:41 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for the IO TLB area.
This size can be influenced using a kernel command line parameter swiotlb.
Unfortunately, the parsing of the kernel command line is done _after_
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:40 +0100
Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es wrote:
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for the IO TLB area.
This size can be influenced using a kernel command line parameter swiotlb.
Unfortunately, the parsing of the kernel
The current SWIOTLB code uses a default of 64MB for the IO TLB area.
This size can be influenced using a kernel command line parameter swiotlb.
Unfortunately, the parsing of the kernel command line is done _after_ the
swiotlb is initialized on some architectures.
This patch adds a new function
