> We don't need to go to the labal of out … Please avoid a typo for this change description.
> fails, as there is nothing to do. Just return. I suggest to reconsider also this wording. Return directly after a call of the function “of_property_read_u64_array” failed at the beginning. > And we can … Do such words indicate that even this patch approach should be split into further update steps? Regards, Markus
