On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:51 PM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> > will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> > can't support
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
> per device pool
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new getter, get_io_tlb_mem, to help select the io_tlb_mem struct.
> The restricted DMA pool is preferred if available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
per device pool and the default pool in swiotlb_alloc.
Add a new getter, get_io_tlb_mem, to help select the io_tlb_mem struct.
The restricted DMA pool is preferred if available.
Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
---
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
