On 09/01/24 9:57 am, Hari Bathini wrote:
Hi Michael,
Sorry, Michael.
I am just about getting back to work and I spoke too soon.
You already seem to have posted a set with the approach you had in mind:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=388350
Thanks
Hari
I
Hi Michael,
I am fine with either approach. I was trying to address your concerns
in my way. Looking for your inputs here on how to go about this now..
On 29/11/23 7:00 am, Pingfan Liu wrote:
Hi Hari,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 12:30 PM Hari Bathini wrote:
Hi Pingfan, Michael,
On 17/10/23
Hi Hari,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 12:30 PM Hari Bathini wrote:
>
> Hi Pingfan, Michael,
>
> On 17/10/23 4:03 pm, Hari Bathini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 17/10/23 7:58 am, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> >> *** Idea ***
> >> For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes the problem
> >> of
Hi Pingfan, Michael,
On 17/10/23 4:03 pm, Hari Bathini wrote:
On 17/10/23 7:58 am, Pingfan Liu wrote:
*** Idea ***
For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes the problem
of allocating memory for paca_ptrs[]. However, in theory, there is no
requirement to assign cpu's logical
With this patch series applied first and kdump kernel boots fine
with nr_cpus=1 on both PowerNV and PowerVM platforms.
For both patches:
Tested-by: Sourabh Jain
- Sourabh Jain
On 17/10/23 07:58, Pingfan Liu wrote:
*** Idea ***
For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes
On 18/10/23 1:51 pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 6:39 PM Hari Bathini wrote:
On 17/10/23 7:58 am, Pingfan Liu wrote:
*** Idea ***
For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes the problem
of allocating memory for paca_ptrs[]. However, in theory, there is no
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 6:39 PM Hari Bathini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/10/23 7:58 am, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > *** Idea ***
> > For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes the problem
> > of allocating memory for paca_ptrs[]. However, in theory, there is no
> > requirement to assign
On 17/10/23 7:58 am, Pingfan Liu wrote:
*** Idea ***
For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes the problem
of allocating memory for paca_ptrs[]. However, in theory, there is no
requirement to assign cpu's logical id as its present sequence in the
device tree. But there is
*** Idea ***
For kexec -p, the boot cpu can be not the cpu0, this causes the problem
of allocating memory for paca_ptrs[]. However, in theory, there is no
requirement to assign cpu's logical id as its present sequence in the
device tree. But there is something like cpu_first_thread_sibling(),
