Re: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm kprobes code

2018-06-07 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:07:26 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao"  wrote:

> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:07:00 +0530
> > "Naveen N. Rao"  wrote:
> > 
> >> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> > Don't call the ->break_handler() from the arm kprobes code,
> >>^^^ powerpc
> >> 
> >> > because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.
> >> > 
> >> > This also makes skip_singlestep() a static function since
> >> > only ftrace-kprobe.c is using this function.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
> >> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> >> > Cc: Paul Mackerras 
> >> > Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> >> > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" 
> >> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> >> > ---
> >> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h   |   10 --
> >> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |   16 +++-
> >> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c|   31 
> >> > +++
> >> >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> With 2 small comments...
> > 
> > 2 ? or 1 ?
> 
> Two, with one in the commit log above :)

Oops, sorry I missed it. yeah, the comment above is my mistake. I'll fix it.

Thanks!


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu 


Re: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm kprobes code

2018-06-07 Thread Naveen N. Rao

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:07:00 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao"  wrote:


Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Don't call the ->break_handler() from the arm kprobes code,
^^^ powerpc

> because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.
> 
> This also makes skip_singlestep() a static function since

> only ftrace-kprobe.c is using this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 

> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> Cc: Paul Mackerras 
> Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" 
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h   |   10 --
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |   16 +++-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c|   31 +++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

With 2 small comments...


2 ? or 1 ?


Two, with one in the commit log above :)

- Naveen




Re: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm kprobes code

2018-06-07 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 17:07:00 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao"  wrote:

> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Don't call the ->break_handler() from the arm kprobes code,
>   ^^^ powerpc
> 
> > because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.
> > 
> > This also makes skip_singlestep() a static function since
> > only ftrace-kprobe.c is using this function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras 
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" 
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h   |   10 --
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |   16 +++-
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c|   31 +++
> >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> With 2 small comments...

2 ? or 1 ?

> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao 
> 
> - Naveen
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h 
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > index 674036db558b..785c464b6588 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
> > @@ -102,16 +102,6 @@ extern int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct 
> > notifier_block *self,
> >  extern int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
> >  extern int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >  extern int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> > -extern int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > -  struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb);
> > -#else
> > -static inline int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> > -{
> > -   return 0;
> > -}
> > -#endif
> >  #else
> >  static inline int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
> >  static inline int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c 
> > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
> > index 1b316331c2d9..3869b0e5d5c7 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
> > @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
> >  #include 
> > 
> >  static nokprobe_inline
> > -int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
> > +int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > +   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
> >  {
> > /*
> >  * Emulate singlestep (and also recover regs->nip)
> > @@ -44,16 +44,6 @@ int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs 
> > *regs,
> > return 1;
> >  }
> > 
> > -int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > -   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> > -{
> > -   if (kprobe_ftrace(p))
> > -   return __skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
> > -   else
> > -   return 0;
> > -}
> > -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(skip_singlestep);
> > -
> >  /* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes */
> >  void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long parent_nip,
> >struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > @@ -82,7 +72,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned 
> > long parent_nip,
> > __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
> > kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> > if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
> > -   __skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);
> > +   skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);
> 
> We can probably get rid of skip_singlestep() completely along with 
> orig_nip since instructions are always 4 bytes on powerpc. So, the 
> changes we do to nip should help to recover the value automatically.

Good point! Yes, skip_singlestep() is no more exported, so we just consolidate
it into kprobe_ftrace_handler() for simplifying operation.

Thank you!
> 
> - Naveen
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu 


Re: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm kprobes code

2018-06-07 Thread Naveen N. Rao

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

Don't call the ->break_handler() from the arm kprobes code,

^^^ powerpc


because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.

This also makes skip_singlestep() a static function since
only ftrace-kprobe.c is using this function.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h   |   10 --
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |   16 +++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c|   31 +++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)


With 2 small comments...
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao 

- Naveen



diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 674036db558b..785c464b6588 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -102,16 +102,6 @@ extern int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block 
*self,
 extern int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
 extern int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
-extern int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-  struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb);
-#else
-static inline int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-   return 0;
-}
-#endif
 #else
 static inline int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
 static inline int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c 
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
index 1b316331c2d9..3869b0e5d5c7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
 #include 

 static nokprobe_inline
-int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
+int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
+   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
 {
/*
 * Emulate singlestep (and also recover regs->nip)
@@ -44,16 +44,6 @@ int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
return 1;
 }

-int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-   if (kprobe_ftrace(p))
-   return __skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
-   else
-   return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(skip_singlestep);
-
 /* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes */
 void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long parent_nip,
   struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -82,7 +72,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long 
parent_nip,
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
-   __skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);
+   skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);


We can probably get rid of skip_singlestep() completely along with 
orig_nip since instructions are always 4 bytes on powerpc. So, the 
changes we do to nip should help to recover the value automatically.


- Naveen




[RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm kprobes code

2018-06-04 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Don't call the ->break_handler() from the arm kprobes code,
because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.

This also makes skip_singlestep() a static function since
only ftrace-kprobe.c is using this function.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h   |   10 --
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |   16 +++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c|   31 +++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 674036db558b..785c464b6588 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -102,16 +102,6 @@ extern int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block 
*self,
 extern int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
 extern int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
-extern int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-  struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb);
-#else
-static inline int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-   return 0;
-}
-#endif
 #else
 static inline int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
 static inline int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c 
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
index 1b316331c2d9..3869b0e5d5c7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
 #include 
 
 static nokprobe_inline
-int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
+int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
+   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
 {
/*
 * Emulate singlestep (and also recover regs->nip)
@@ -44,16 +44,6 @@ int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
return 1;
 }
 
-int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-   if (kprobe_ftrace(p))
-   return __skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
-   else
-   return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(skip_singlestep);
-
 /* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes */
 void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long parent_nip,
   struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -82,7 +72,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long 
parent_nip,
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
-   __skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);
+   skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);
else {
/*
 * If pre_handler returns !0, it sets regs->nip and
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 600678fce0a8..f06747e2e70d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -317,25 +317,17 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
return 1;
-   } else {
-   if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
-   /* If trap variant, then it belongs not to us */
-   kprobe_opcode_t cur_insn = *addr;
-   if (is_trap(cur_insn))
-   goto no_kprobe;
-   /* The breakpoint instruction was removed by
-* another cpu right after we hit, no further
-* handling of this interrupt is appropriate
-*/
-   ret = 1;
+   } else if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
+   /* If trap variant, then it belongs not to us */
+   kprobe_opcode_t cur_insn = *addr;
+
+   if (is_trap(cur_insn))
goto no_kprobe;
-   }
-   p = __this_cpu_read(current_kprobe);
-   if (p->break_handler && p->break_handler(p, regs)) {
-   if (!skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb))
-   goto ss_probe;
-   ret = 1;
-   }
+   /* The breakpoint