On Thu 06-09-18 09:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep
>
> ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> obj-y += nobootmem.o
> else
> obj-y += bootmem.o
> endif
>
> behind?
I can see you have done so in an earlier patch. I have missed that.
--
Michal Hocko
On Wed 05-09-18 18:59:19, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> All architectures have been converted to use MEMBLOCK + NO_BOOTMEM. The
> bootmem allocator implementation can be removed.
\o/
Is there any reason to keep
ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
obj-y += nobootmem.o
else
obj-y
All architectures have been converted to use MEMBLOCK + NO_BOOTMEM. The
bootmem allocator implementation can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport
---
include/linux/bootmem.h | 16 -
mm/bootmem.c| 811
2 files changed, 827
