On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:27 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Li Zhong zh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use
struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors:
In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 21:30 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:27 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Li Zhong zh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use
struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors:
It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use
struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors:
In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
from include/linux/time.h:5,
Li Zhong zh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use
struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors:
In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
