On 03/09/14 13:02, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.08.2014 [17:34:00 +0800], Li Zhong wrote:
As Nish suggested, it makes more sense to init the numa node informatiion
for present cpus at boottime, which could also avoid WARN_ON(1) in
numa_setup_cpu().
Hit this on a Power8 LPAR. With the
On 27.08.2014 [17:34:00 +0800], Li Zhong wrote:
As Nish suggested, it makes more sense to init the numa node informatiion
for present cpus at boottime, which could also avoid WARN_ON(1) in
numa_setup_cpu().
With this change, we also need to change the smp_prepare_cpus() to set up
numa
As Nish suggested, it makes more sense to init the numa node informatiion
for present cpus at boottime, which could also avoid WARN_ON(1) in
numa_setup_cpu().
With this change, we also need to change the smp_prepare_cpus() to set up
numa information only on present cpus.
For those possible, but
