On 29/11/16 11:42, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Balbir.
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:09:26AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On 29/11/16 08:10, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:05:12AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
On my desktop NODES_SHIFT is 6, many distro kernels have it a 9.
Hello, Balbir.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:09:26AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On 29/11/16 08:10, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:05:12AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> On my desktop NODES_SHIFT is 6, many distro kernels have it a 9. I've known
> >> of solutions that use fake
On 29/11/16 08:10, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:05:12AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On my desktop NODES_SHIFT is 6, many distro kernels have it a 9. I've known
>> of solutions that use fake NUMA for partitioning and need as many nodes as
>> possible.
>
> It was a crude kludge
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:05:12AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On my desktop NODES_SHIFT is 6, many distro kernels have it a 9. I've known
> of solutions that use fake NUMA for partitioning and need as many nodes as
> possible.
It was a crude kludge that people used before memcg. If people
On Thu 24-11-16 00:05:12, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/16 20:28, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > I am more worried about synchronization with the hotplug which tends to
> > be a PITA in places were we were simply safe by definition until now. We
> > do not have all that many users of
On 23/11/16 20:28, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 23-11-16 19:37:16, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/11/16 19:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 23-11-16 18:50:42, Balbir Singh wrote:
On 23/11/16 18:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
On Wed 23-11-16 19:37:16, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/16 19:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 23-11-16 18:50:42, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23/11/16 18:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
> In the absence of hotplug we use extra
On 23/11/16 19:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 23-11-16 18:50:42, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/11/16 18:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
In the absence of hotplug we use extra memory proportional to
(possible_nodes - online_nodes) *
On Wed 23-11-16 18:50:42, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/16 18:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> In the absence of hotplug we use extra memory proportional to
> >> (possible_nodes - online_nodes) * number_of_cgroups. PPC64 has a patch
> >> to
On 23/11/16 18:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> In the absence of hotplug we use extra memory proportional to
>> (possible_nodes - online_nodes) * number_of_cgroups. PPC64 has a patch
>> to disable large consumption with large number of cgroups. This
On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
> In the absence of hotplug we use extra memory proportional to
> (possible_nodes - online_nodes) * number_of_cgroups. PPC64 has a patch
> to disable large consumption with large number of cgroups. This patch
> adds hotplug support to memory cgroups
In the absence of hotplug we use extra memory proportional to
(possible_nodes - online_nodes) * number_of_cgroups. PPC64 has a patch
to disable large consumption with large number of cgroups. This patch
adds hotplug support to memory cgroups and reverts the commit that
limited possible nodes to
12 matches
Mail list logo
