On Mon, Sep 17 2007, David Howells wrote:
>
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Which solution would you be more comfortable with?
> >
> > The one which is currently in -mm is this one:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=49892223
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which solution would you be more comfortable with?
>
> The one which is currently in -mm is this one:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=49892223f7d3a2333ef9e6cbdd526676e1fc517a
In my opinion, this is t
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:50 -0700, Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote:
> Which solution would you be more comfortable with?
The one which is currently in -mm is this one:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=49892223f7d3a2333ef9e6cbdd526676e1fc517a
James
__
FIG_BLK_DEV_BSG)
struct bsg_class_device {
struct class_device *class_dev;
...
However, I was wondering if there isn't a cleaner way of doing it. For
example, from the comments in scsi_sysfs.c it looks like it would be
possible not to call bsg_register_queue() at
