Hi,
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/13 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
[...]
+ };
+
+ e...@3fc { // Enhanced Time Processing
Unit
+ compatible = fsl,mpc5554-etpu;
+ reg =
Hi Grant,
thanks for the comments, I solved some of the points you mentioned. I need some
more time to work on the others. In the meantime I send the intermediate
version.
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/13 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
[...]
+ mem...@4000 {
+
2010/3/22 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
Hi Grant,
thanks for the comments, I solved some of the points you mentioned. I need
some
more time to work on the others. In the meantime I send the intermediate
version.
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/13 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
[...]
+
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/22 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
Hi Grant,
thanks for the comments, I solved some of the points you mentioned. I need
some
more time to work on the others. In the meantime I send the intermediate
version.
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/13 Németh Márton
Hi Grant, David and Segher,
is there any comments or suggestions about this MPC5554 device tree?
Regards,
Márton Németh
Németh Márton wrote:
Hi,
here is a version with modified cpu node, xbar ranges and added interrupt
sources.
Please send comments.
Regards,
Márton
2010/3/13 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
Hi,
here is a version with modified cpu node, xbar ranges and added interrupt
sources.
Please send comments.
Hi Márton. A few comments below.
---
From: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu
Add device tree for Freescale MPC5554.
Signed-off-by:
Hi,
here is a version with modified cpu node, xbar ranges and added interrupt
sources.
Please send comments.
Regards,
Márton Németh
---
From: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu
Add device tree for Freescale MPC5554.
Signed-off-by: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu
---
diff -uprN
2010/3/11 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
Hi,
thank you for the comments, I reworked the Freescale MPC5554 device tree
accordingly. I'm listening for comments on this draft.
Regards,
Márton Németh
---
From: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu
Add device tree for Freescale MPC5554.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:14:56AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/11 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
[snip]
+
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 0;
+
+ c...@0 {
+ device_type = cpu;
+
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:36 PM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:14:56AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/11 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
[snip]
+
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 0;
+
+
The historical background here is that in the original OF spec, driver
matching was done on node name, and only then on compatible.
Essentially the node name was treated as an implicit first entry in
the compatible list. The the generic names convention came along, and
instead name became a
In this particular case, we're talking about a part that has never
previously been described in a device tree. So, since this is
something entirely new, what is the value in preserving the
PowerPC, style when there isn't any code that will be relying on
it?
There could be code that
Hi,
thank you for the comments, I reworked the Freescale MPC5554 device tree
accordingly. I'm listening for comments on this draft.
Regards,
Márton Németh
---
From: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu
Add device tree for Freescale MPC5554.
Signed-off-by: Márton Németh nm...@freemail.hu
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/9 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
Hi,
Grant Likely wrote:
2010/3/8 Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu:
[snip]
As far as I could find out I'll need to create a device tree as documented
in
the linux/Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt file.
Yes, you'll
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:11:56AM +0100, Németh Márton wrote:
[snip]
+/dts-v1/;
+
+/ {
+ model = MPC5554;
+ compatible = fsl,MPC5554EVB; // Freescale MPC5554 Evaluation
Board
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells
15 matches
Mail list logo
