Re: Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c
I did some grep on codebase. I have not found any other instances of nested functions, but my regexps are not enough to be 100% sure. On Wednesday 07 October 2009 18:23:04 v...@vsbe.com wrote: Guys, are there other instances of nested C functions in the codebase or was this the first attempt? On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jérôme Pouiller j...@sysmic.org wrote: Dear, I have a problem with commit 8bc487d150b939e69830c39322df4ee486efe381 in file drivers/of/of_mdio.c in function of_phy_find_device. As you see, this function define match() as a nested function. My compiler (powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4.1) raise an error during link due to this nested definition: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x5e2a4): In function `of_phy_find_device': /home/jezz/linux-next/drivers/of/of_mdio.c:107: undefined reference to `__trampoline_setup' I am sure I could solve problem by rebuilding my toolchain. Nevertheless, I think nested function definition is not perfectly supported by all compilers. Also, I suggest to place function match() outside of scope of of_phy_find_device as in following patch. I'm okay with that, but if you're moving code out of the file scope, then please rename the function to of_phy_match() to avoid global namespace conflicts. g. diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c index bacaa53..c7b2e26 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int of_mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *mdio, struct device_node *np) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); +static int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) +{ + return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; +} /** * of_phy_find_device - Give a PHY node, find the phy_device * @phy_np: Pointer to the phy's device tree node @@ -106,11 +110,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); struct phy_device *of_phy_find_device(struct device_node *phy_np) { struct device *d; - int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) - { - return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; - } - if (!phy_np) return NULL; What do you think about it? Best regards, -- Jérôme Pouiller (jezz AT sysmic DOT org) -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev -- Jérôme Pouiller (jerome AT sysmic DOT org) Expert Linux Embarqué ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c
Dear, I have a problem with commit 8bc487d150b939e69830c39322df4ee486efe381 in file drivers/of/of_mdio.c in function of_phy_find_device. As you see, this function define match() as a nested function. My compiler (powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4.1) raise an error during link due to this nested definition: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x5e2a4): In function `of_phy_find_device': /home/jezz/linux-next/drivers/of/of_mdio.c:107: undefined reference to `__trampoline_setup' I am sure I could solve problem by rebuilding my toolchain. Nevertheless, I think nested function definition is not perfectly supported by all compilers. Also, I suggest to place function match() outside of scope of of_phy_find_device as in following patch. diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c index bacaa53..c7b2e26 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int of_mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *mdio, struct device_node *np) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); +static int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) +{ + return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; +} /** * of_phy_find_device - Give a PHY node, find the phy_device * @phy_np: Pointer to the phy's device tree node @@ -106,11 +110,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); struct phy_device *of_phy_find_device(struct device_node *phy_np) { struct device *d; - int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) - { - return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; - } - if (!phy_np) return NULL; What do you think about it? Best regards, -- Jérôme Pouiller (jezz AT sysmic DOT org) ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jérôme Pouiller j...@sysmic.org wrote: Dear, I have a problem with commit 8bc487d150b939e69830c39322df4ee486efe381 in file drivers/of/of_mdio.c in function of_phy_find_device. As you see, this function define match() as a nested function. My compiler (powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4.1) raise an error during link due to this nested definition: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x5e2a4): In function `of_phy_find_device': /home/jezz/linux-next/drivers/of/of_mdio.c:107: undefined reference to `__trampoline_setup' I am sure I could solve problem by rebuilding my toolchain. Nevertheless, I think nested function definition is not perfectly supported by all compilers. Also, I suggest to place function match() outside of scope of of_phy_find_device as in following patch. I'm okay with that, but if you're moving code out of the file scope, then please rename the function to of_phy_match() to avoid global namespace conflicts. g. diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c index bacaa53..c7b2e26 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int of_mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *mdio, struct device_node *np) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); +static int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) +{ + return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; +} /** * of_phy_find_device - Give a PHY node, find the phy_device * @phy_np: Pointer to the phy's device tree node @@ -106,11 +110,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); struct phy_device *of_phy_find_device(struct device_node *phy_np) { struct device *d; - int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) - { - return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; - } - if (!phy_np) return NULL; What do you think about it? Best regards, -- Jérôme Pouiller (jezz AT sysmic DOT org) -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c
Guys, are there other instances of nested C functions in the codebase or was this the first attempt? On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jérôme Pouiller j...@sysmic.org wrote: Dear, I have a problem with commit 8bc487d150b939e69830c39322df4ee486efe381 in file drivers/of/of_mdio.c in function of_phy_find_device. As you see, this function define match() as a nested function. My compiler (powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4.1) raise an error during link due to this nested definition: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x5e2a4): In function `of_phy_find_device': /home/jezz/linux-next/drivers/of/of_mdio.c:107: undefined reference to `__trampoline_setup' I am sure I could solve problem by rebuilding my toolchain. Nevertheless, I think nested function definition is not perfectly supported by all compilers. Also, I suggest to place function match() outside of scope of of_phy_find_device as in following patch. I'm okay with that, but if you're moving code out of the file scope, then please rename the function to of_phy_match() to avoid global namespace conflicts. g. diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c index bacaa53..c7b2e26 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int of_mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *mdio, struct device_node *np) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); +static int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) +{ + return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; +} /** * of_phy_find_device - Give a PHY node, find the phy_device * @phy_np: Pointer to the phy's device tree node @@ -106,11 +110,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register); struct phy_device *of_phy_find_device(struct device_node *phy_np) { struct device *d; - int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np) - { - return dev_archdata_get_node(dev-archdata) == phy_np; - } - if (!phy_np) return NULL; What do you think about it? Best regards, -- Jérôme Pouiller (jezz AT sysmic DOT org) -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev