Re: New linux-next KCFLAGS

2018-11-26 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
On 11/26/18 8:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...)

Re: New linux-next KCFLAGS

2018-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > > Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this > > too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...) > > Ah, yes, you may be right.

Re: New linux-next KCFLAGS

2018-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Kees, On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > > Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this > > too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...) > > Ah, yes, you may be right.

Re: New linux-next KCFLAGS

2018-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Kees, On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this > too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...) Ah, yes, you may be right. everyone will see them :-( I may have to figure out another way to do this for

Re: New linux-next KCFLAGS

2018-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Kees, On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:34:33 +0100 Kees Cook wrote: > > So, if you it's possible to "seed" some new flags for linux-next, I'd > be interested in making sure no new instances of warnings from > -Wimplicit-fallthrough (gcc 7.1 and later) appear. VLAs will be gone > in a couple days, so