Qian Cai wrote:
On Apr 17, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Hi Qian,
Qian Cai wrote:
OK, reverted the commit,
c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
RELOCATABLE”)
or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
thread,
http
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>
> Hi Qian,
>
> Qian Cai wrote:
>> OK, reverted the commit,
>> c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
>> RELOCATABLE”)
>> or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
>> thread
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 10:46 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 22:40 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> On Apr 16, 2020, at 10:27 PM, Russell Currey
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Reverting the patch with the given config will have the same effect
>>> as
>>> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n. Not discountin
"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> Hi Qian,
>
> Qian Cai wrote:
>> OK, reverted the commit,
>>
>> c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
>> RELOCATABLE”)
>>
>> or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
>> thread,
>>
>> https://lore.kerne
Steven Rostedt writes:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:19:10 -0400
> Qian Cai wrote:
>
>> OK, reverted the commit,
>>
>> c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
>> RELOCATABLE”)
>>
>> or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
>> thread,
Hi Qian,
Qian Cai wrote:
OK, reverted the commit,
c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
RELOCATABLE”)
or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
thread,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/15ac5b0e-a221-4b8c-9039-fa96b8ef7...@lca.pw/
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 10:46 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 22:40 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> On Apr 16, 2020, at 10:27 PM, Russell Currey
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Reverting the patch with the given config will have the same effect
>>> as
>>> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n. Not discountin
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 22:40 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 2020, at 10:27 PM, Russell Currey
> > wrote:
> >
> > Reverting the patch with the given config will have the same effect
> > as
> > STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n. Not discounting that it could be a bug on the
> > powerpc side (i.e. relocata
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 10:27 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
>
> Reverting the patch with the given config will have the same effect as
> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n. Not discounting that it could be a bug on the
> powerpc side (i.e. relocatable kernels with strict RWX on haven't been
> exhaustively tested
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 22:17 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:19:10 -0400
> Qian Cai wrote:
>
> > OK, reverted the commit,
> >
> > c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility
> > with RELOCATABLE”)
> >
> > or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:19:10 -0400
Qian Cai wrote:
> OK, reverted the commit,
>
> c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
> RELOCATABLE”)
>
> or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
> thread,
This may be a symptom and not a cu
OK, reverted the commit,
c55d7b5e6426 (“powerpc: Remove STRICT_KERNEL_RWX incompatibility with
RELOCATABLE”)
or set STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n fixed the crash below and also mentioned in this
thread,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/15ac5b0e-a221-4b8c-9039-fa96b8ef7...@lca.pw/
[ 148.110969][T13115] LTP
12 matches
Mail list logo