Terry Bowman wrote:
> From: Robert Richter
>
> In Restricted CXL Device (RCD) mode a CXL device is exposed as an
> RCiEP, but CXL downstream and upstream ports are not enumerated and
> not visible in the PCIe hierarchy. [1] Protocol and link errors from
> these non-enumerated ports are signaled as internal AER errors, either
> Uncorrectable Internal Error (UIE) or Corrected Internal Errors (CIE)
> via an RCEC.
>
> Restricted CXL host (RCH) downstream port-detected errors have the
> Requster ID of the RCEC set in the RCEC's AER Error Source ID
> register. A CXL handler must then inspect the error status in various
> CXL registers residing in the dport's component register space (CXL
> RAS capability) or the dport's RCRB (PCIe AER extended
> capability). [2]
>
> Errors showing up in the RCEC's error handler must be handled and
> connected to the CXL subsystem. Implement this by forwarding the error
> to all CXL devices below the RCEC. Since the entire CXL device is
> controlled only using PCIe Configuration Space of device 0, function
> 0, only pass it there [3]. The error handling is limited to currently
> supported devices with the Memory Device class code set (CXL Type 3
> Device, PCI_CLASS_MEMORY_CXL, 502h), handle downstream port errors in
> the device's cxl_pci driver. Support for other CXL Device Types
> (e.g. a CXL.cache Device) can be added later.
>
> To handle downstream port errors in addition to errors directed to the
> CXL endpoint device, a handler must also inspect the CXL RAS and PCIe
> AER capabilities of the CXL downstream port the device is connected
> to.
>
> Since CXL downstream port errors are signaled using internal errors,
> the handler requires those errors to be unmasked. This is subject of a
> follow-on patch.
>
> The reason for choosing this implementation is that the AER service
> driver claims the RCEC device, but does not allow it to register a
> custom specific handler to support CXL. Connecting the RCEC hard-wired
> with a CXL handler does not work, as the CXL subsystem might not be
> present all the time. The alternative to add an implementation to the
> portdrv to allow the registration of a custom RCEC error handler isn't
> worth doing it as CXL would be its only user. Instead, just check for
> an CXL RCEC and pass it down to the connected CXL device's error
> handler. With this approach the code can entirely be implemented in
> the PCIe AER driver and is independent of the CXL subsystem. The CXL
> driver only provides the handler.
>
> [1] CXL 3.0 spec: 9.11.8 CXL Devices Attached to an RCH
> [2] CXL 3.0 spec, 12.2.1.1 RCH Downstream Port-detected Errors
> [3] CXL 3.0 spec, 8.1.3 PCIe DVSEC for CXL Devices
>
> Co-developed-by: Terry Bowman
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter
> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran"
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 96 +++-
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig
> index 228652a59f27..4f0e70fafe2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig
> @@ -49,6 +49,18 @@ config PCIEAER_INJECT
> gotten from:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gong.chen/aer-inject.git/
>
> +config PCIEAER_CXL
> + bool "PCI Express CXL RAS support for Restricted Hosts (RCH)"
> + default y
> + depends on PCIEAER && CXL_PCI
> + help
> + Enables error handling of downstream ports of a CXL host
> + that is operating in RCD mode (Restricted CXL Host, RCH).
> + The downstream port reports AER errors to a given RCEC.
> + Errors are handled by the CXL memory device driver.
> +
> + If unsure, say Y.
> +
> #
> # PCI Express ECRC
> #
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index d3344fcf1f79..c354ca5e8f2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -946,14 +946,100 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
> return true;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL
> +
> +static bool is_cxl_mem_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The capability, status, and control fields in Device 0,
> + * Function 0 DVSEC control the CXL functionality of the
> + * entire device (CXL 3.0, 8.1.3).
> + */
> + if (dev->devfn != PCI_DEVFN(0, 0))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * CXL Memory Devices must have the 502h class code set (CXL
> + * 3.0, 8.1.12.1).
> + */
> + if ((dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_MEMORY_CXL)
> + return false;
I think this is ok for now, but I expect it will want to be something
like dev->is_cxl in the future where that is the cached result of:
dev->is_cxl =
