Hi Chris,
On 28/07/15 20:39, Chris (Christopher) Brand wrote:
Based on include/xen/mm.h [1], Linux is mistakenly using MFN when GFN is
meant,
I suspect this is because the first support for Xen was for PV. This brough
some
Typo : brought
Perhaps resulted in would be better ?
On 29/07/15 12:35, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Wei,
On 29/07/15 11:13, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:02:45PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index 7d50711..3b7b7c3 100644
---
Hi Wei,
On 29/07/15 11:13, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:02:45PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index 7d50711..3b7b7c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++
On 28/07/15 18:16, David Vrabel wrote:
On 28/07/15 16:02, Julien Grall wrote:
Based on include/xen/mm.h [1], Linux is mistakenly using MFN when GFN
is meant, I suspect this is because the first support for Xen was for
PV. This brough some misimplementation of helpers on ARM and make the
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:35:54PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Wei,
On 29/07/15 11:13, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:02:45PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index 7d50711..3b7b7c3
On 28/07/15 16:02, Julien Grall wrote:
Based on include/xen/mm.h [1], Linux is mistakenly using MFN when GFN
is meant, I suspect this is because the first support for Xen was for
PV. This brough some misimplementation of helpers on ARM and make the
developper confused the expected behavior.
Based on include/xen/mm.h [1], Linux is mistakenly using MFN when GFN is
meant,
I suspect this is because the first support for Xen was for PV. This brough
some
Typo : brought
Perhaps resulted in would be better ?
misimplementation of helpers on ARM and make the developper confused the
