Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

2009-11-30 Thread Will Schmidt
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:19 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:12 -0600, Will Schmidt wrote: Tested-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Isn't it assumed that the one that made the patch also tested it? Well I

hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

2009-11-25 Thread Will Schmidt
The tb_total and purr_total values reported via the hcall_stats code should be cumulative, rather than being replaced by the latest delta tb or purr value. Tested-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com --- [ This is a touch-up to the

Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

2009-11-25 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:12 -0600, Will Schmidt wrote: Tested-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Isn't it assumed that the one that made the patch also tested it? Well I would hope that is the norm. -- Steve

Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

2009-11-25 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi Will, The tb_total and purr_total values reported via the hcall_stats code should be cumulative, rather than being replaced by the latest delta tb or purr value. Tested-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com Ouch! Nice catch.