Re: libfdt: Make unit address optional for finding nodes

So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: At present, the fdt_subnode_offset() and fdt_path_offset() functions in libfdt require the exact name of the nodes in question be passed, including unit address. This is contrary to traditional OF-like finddevice() behaviour, which allows the

libfdt: Make unit address optional for finding nodes

At present, the fdt_subnode_offset() and fdt_path_offset() functions in libfdt require the exact name of the nodes in question be passed, including unit address. This is contrary to traditional OF-like finddevice() behaviour, which allows the unit address to be omitted (which is useful when the