Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2022-12-02 Thread Michael Ellerman
Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c: In function 'text_area_cpu_up_mm': > arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c:157:14: error: implicit declaration of > function

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2022-12-01 Thread Benjamin Gray
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 11:26 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Though, I wonder if the powerpc tree should > use mm_alloc() instead of copy_init_mm() as well?  The tip tree > commit > says: > >     Instead of duplicating init_mm, allocate a fresh mm. The > advantage is >     that mm_alloc() has

linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2022-12-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c: In function 'text_area_cpu_up_mm': arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c:157:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_init_mm'

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2020-03-30 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:17 AM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 07:04:16PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Or just squash the hunk Stephen posted into the commit, which is what I > > thought would happen to begin with. > > > > You can have my ack for it: > > > > Acked-by:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2020-03-30 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 07:04:16PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Or just squash the hunk Stephen posted into the commit, which is what I > thought would happen to begin with. > > You can have my ack for it: > > Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc) Thanks but considering how this is not

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2020-03-30 Thread Michael Ellerman
Borislav Petkov writes: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 03:08:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> What you really need is an Ack from the PowerPC people for the fix you >> suggested and then tha fix should go in the same series that is now >> causing the failure (preferably before the problematic

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2020-03-30 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 03:08:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > What you really need is an Ack from the PowerPC people for the fix you > suggested and then tha fix should go in the same series that is now > causing the failure (preferably before the problematic (for PowerPC) > patch. I'll zap

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2020-03-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi H.J., On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 20:53:42 -0700 "H.J. Lu" wrote: > > Please see my enclosing email. Is anyone from PPC community reading emails? What you really need is an Ack from the PowerPC people for the fix you suggested and then tha fix should go in the same series that is now causing the

linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

2013-02-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c:397:2: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c:397:2: error: (near initialization for