Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:53:27PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Just my 2cents from drm (where we deprecate old gunk uapi quite often): > > Imo it's best to keep the uapi headers as-is, but exchange the > > documentation with a big "this is removed, never use again" warning: > > We in RDMA have been doing the opposite, the uapi headers are supposed > to reflect the current kernel. This helps make the kernel > understandable. > > When userspace needs backwards compat to ABI that the current kernel > doesn't support then userspace has distinct copies of that information > in some compat location. It has happened a few times over the last 15 > years. > > We keep full copies of the current kernel headers in the userspace > source tree, when the kernel headers change in a compile incompatible > way we fix everything while updating to the new kernel headers. Yeah we do the same since forever (it's either from libdrm package, or directly in the corresponding userspace header). So largely include/uapi is for documentation > > - it's good to know which uapi numbers (like parameter extensions or > > whatever they are in this case) are defacto reserved, because there are > > binaries (qemu in this) that have code acting on them out there. > > Numbers and things get marked reserved or the like > > > Anyway feel free to ignore since this might be different than drivers/gpu. > > AFAIK drives/gpu has a lot wider userspace, rdma manages this OK > because we only have one library package that provides the user/kernel > interface. But since we have some many projects we've started asking all the userspace projects to directly take the kernel ones (after the make step to filter them) so that there's only one source of truth. And also to make sure they don't merge stuff before the kernel side is reviewed Which also means we can't ditch anything userspace might still need on older trees and stuff. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Just my 2cents from drm (where we deprecate old gunk uapi quite often): > Imo it's best to keep the uapi headers as-is, but exchange the > documentation with a big "this is removed, never use again" warning: We in RDMA have been doing the opposite, the uapi headers are supposed to reflect the current kernel. This helps make the kernel understandable. When userspace needs backwards compat to ABI that the current kernel doesn't support then userspace has distinct copies of that information in some compat location. It has happened a few times over the last 15 years. We keep full copies of the current kernel headers in the userspace source tree, when the kernel headers change in a compile incompatible way we fix everything while updating to the new kernel headers. > - it's good to know which uapi numbers (like parameter extensions or > whatever they are in this case) are defacto reserved, because there are > binaries (qemu in this) that have code acting on them out there. Numbers and things get marked reserved or the like > Anyway feel free to ignore since this might be different than drivers/gpu. AFAIK drives/gpu has a lot wider userspace, rdma manages this OK because we only have one library package that provides the user/kernel interface. Jason
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, 4 May 2021 16:11:31 +0200 Greg Kurz wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2021 15:30:15 +0200 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:20:34PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 14:59:07 +0200 > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 > > > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > > > > > > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > > > > > > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > > > > > > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > > > > > > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > > > > > > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci > > > > > > driver > > > > > > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > > > > > > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > > > > > > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > > > > > > the best idea is to simply kill. > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > > > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > > > > > > - add the ACK from Greg > > > > > > > > > > > > Diffstat: > > > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > > > > > > --- > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > > > > > > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > > > > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > > > > > > > What uapi changes? > > > > > > > > > > All macros and structure definitions that are being removed > > > from include/uapi/linux/vfio.h by patch 1. > > > > > > > What exactly breaks? > > > > > > > > > > These macros and types are used by the current QEMU code base. > > > Next time the QEMU source tree updates its copy of the kernel > > > headers, the compilation of affected code will fail. > > > > So does QEMU use this api that is being removed, or does it just have > > some odd build artifacts of the uapi things? > > > > These are region subtypes definition and associated capabilities. > QEMU basically gets information on VFIO regions from the kernel > driver and for those regions with a nvlink2 subtype, it tries > to extract some more nvlink2 related info. Urgh, let's put the uapi header back in place with a deprecation notice. Userspace should never have a dependency on the existence of a given region, but clearly will have code to parse the data structure describing that region. I'll post a patch. Thanks, Alex
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, 4 May 2021 15:30:15 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:20:34PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 14:59:07 +0200 > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 > > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > > > > > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > > > > > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > > > > > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > > > > > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > > > > > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver > > > > > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > > > > > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > > > > > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > > > > > the best idea is to simply kill. > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > > > > > - add the ACK from Greg > > > > > > > > > > Diffstat: > > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > > > > > --- > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > > > > > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > > > > > What uapi changes? > > > > > > > All macros and structure definitions that are being removed > > from include/uapi/linux/vfio.h by patch 1. > > > > > What exactly breaks? > > > > > > > These macros and types are used by the current QEMU code base. > > Next time the QEMU source tree updates its copy of the kernel > > headers, the compilation of affected code will fail. > > So does QEMU use this api that is being removed, or does it just have > some odd build artifacts of the uapi things? > These are region subtypes definition and associated capabilities. QEMU basically gets information on VFIO regions from the kernel driver and for those regions with a nvlink2 subtype, it tries to extract some more nvlink2 related info. > What exactly is the error messages here? > [55/143] Compiling C object libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_vfio_pci-quirks.c.o FAILED: libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_vfio_pci-quirks.c.o cc -Ilibqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p -I. -I../.. -Itarget/ppc -I../../target/ppc -I../../capstone/include/capstone -Iqapi -Itrace -Iui -Iui/shader -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -fdiagnostics-color=auto -pipe -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=gnu99 -O2 -g -isystem /home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-virtiofs/linux-headers -isystem linux-headers -iquote . -iquote /home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-virtiofs -iquote /home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-virtiofs/include -iquote /home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-virtiofs/disas/libvixl -iquote /home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-virtiofs/tcg/ppc -iquote /home/greg/Work/qemu/qemu-virtiofs/accel/tcg -pthread -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wendif-labels -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 -Wno-missing-include-dirs -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-psabi -fstack-protector-strong -fPIC -isystem../../linux-headers -isystemlinux-headers -DNEED_CPU_H '-DCONFIG_TARGET="ppc64-softmmu-config-target.h"' '-DCONFIG_DEVICES="ppc64-softmmu-config-devices.h"' -MD -MQ libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_vfio_pci-quirks.c.o -MF libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_vfio_pci-quirks.c.o.d -o libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_vfio_pci-quirks.c.o -c ../../hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c ../../hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c: In function ‘vfio_pci_nvidia_v100_ram_init’:
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:20:34PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2021 14:59:07 +0200 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > > > > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > > > > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > > > > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > > > > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > > > > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver > > > > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > > > > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > > > > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > > > > the best idea is to simply kill. > > > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > > > > - add the ACK from Greg > > > > > > > > Diffstat: > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > > > > --- > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > > > > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - > > > > > > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > > > What uapi changes? > > > > All macros and structure definitions that are being removed > from include/uapi/linux/vfio.h by patch 1. Just my 2cents from drm (where we deprecate old gunk uapi quite often): Imo it's best to keep the uapi headers as-is, but exchange the documentation with a big "this is removed, never use again" warning: - it occasionally serves as a good lesson for how to not do uapi (whatever the reasons really are in the specific case) - it's good to know which uapi numbers (like parameter extensions or whatever they are in this case) are defacto reserved, because there are binaries (qemu in this) that have code acting on them out there. The only exception where we completely nuke the structs and #defines is when uapi has been only used by testcases. Which we know, since we defacto limit our stable uapi guarantee to the canonical open userspace drivers only (for at least the driver-specific stuff, the cross-driver interfaces are hopeless). Anyway feel free to ignore since this might be different than drivers/gpu. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, 4 May 2021 14:59:07 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > > > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > > > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > > > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > > > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > > > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver > > > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > > > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > > > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > > > the best idea is to simply kill. > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > > > - add the ACK from Greg > > > > > > Diffstat: > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > > > --- > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > > > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - > > > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > What uapi changes? > All macros and structure definitions that are being removed from include/uapi/linux/vfio.h by patch 1. > What exactly breaks? > These macros and types are used by the current QEMU code base. Next time the QEMU source tree updates its copy of the kernel headers, the compilation of affected code will fail. > Why does QEMU require kernel driver stuff? > Not sure to understand the question... is there a problem with QEMU using an already published uapi ? > thanks, > > greg k-h
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:20:34PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2021 14:59:07 +0200 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > > > > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > > > > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > > > > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > > > > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > > > > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver > > > > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > > > > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > > > > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > > > > the best idea is to simply kill. > > > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > > > > - add the ACK from Greg > > > > > > > > Diffstat: > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > > > > --- > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > > > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > > > > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - > > > > > > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > > > What uapi changes? > > > > All macros and structure definitions that are being removed > from include/uapi/linux/vfio.h by patch 1. > > > What exactly breaks? > > > > These macros and types are used by the current QEMU code base. > Next time the QEMU source tree updates its copy of the kernel > headers, the compilation of affected code will fail. So does QEMU use this api that is being removed, or does it just have some odd build artifacts of the uapi things? What exactly is the error messages here? And if we put the uapi .h file stuff back, is that sufficient for qemu to work, as it should be checking at runtime what the kernel has / has not anyway, right? thanks, greg k-h
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, 4 May 2021 15:00:39 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:59:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > > > What uapi changes? > > > > What exactly breaks? > > > > Why does QEMU require kernel driver stuff? > > Looks like it pull in the uapi struct definitions unconditionally > instead of having a local copy. We could fix that by just putting > them back, but to me this seems like a rather broken configuration > in qemu when it pulls in headers from the running/installed kernel > without any feature checks before using them. > It is not pulling them from the installed kernel, but from a development version to get new definitions. Removing things in the kernel requires workarounds in QEMU until it can remove those things as well. It is not a dumb update...
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:59:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. > > What uapi changes? > > What exactly breaks? > > Why does QEMU require kernel driver stuff? Looks like it pull in the uapi struct definitions unconditionally instead of having a local copy. We could fix that by just putting them back, but to me this seems like a rather broken configuration in qemu when it pulls in headers from the running/installed kernel without any feature checks before using them.
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver > > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > > the best idea is to simply kill. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > > - add the ACK from Greg > > > > Diffstat: > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > > --- > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - > > > Hi Christoph, > > FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. What uapi changes? What exactly breaks? Why does QEMU require kernel driver stuff? thanks, greg k-h
Re: remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:13:09 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware > feature without any open source component - what would normally be > the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, > although in this particular case user space could of course be a > kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that > does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver > and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc > kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these > issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think > the best idea is to simply kill. > > Changes since v1: > - document the removed subtypes as reserved > - add the ACK from Greg > > Diffstat: > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 > --- > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 > b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 > b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 > b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - Hi Christoph, FYI, these uapi changes break build of QEMU. I guess QEMU people should take some action before this percolates to the QEMU source tree. Cc'ing relevant QEMU lists to bring the discussion there. Cheers, -- Greg > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_nvlink2.c | 490 -- > 16 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1511 deletions(-)
remove the nvlink2 pci_vfio subdriver v2
Hi all, the nvlink2 vfio subdriver is a weird beast. It supports a hardware feature without any open source component - what would normally be the normal open source userspace that we require for kernel drivers, although in this particular case user space could of course be a kernel driver in a VM. It also happens to be a complete mess that does not properly bind to PCI IDs, is hacked into the vfio_pci driver and also pulles in over 1000 lines of code always build into powerpc kernels that have Power NV support enabled. Because of all these issues and the lack of breaking userspace when it is removed I think the best idea is to simply kill. Changes since v1: - document the removed subtypes as reserved - add the ACK from Greg Diffstat: arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 705 --- b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h|3 b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |1 b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h |7 b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile|2 b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c |2 b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 185 --- b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 11 b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 17 b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c | 23 b/drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig |6 b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile |1 b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c| 18 b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h| 14 b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 38 - drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_nvlink2.c | 490 -- 16 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1511 deletions(-)
