On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:59:33PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
D'oh. I spent so much time and the solution is so easy.
Thanks everybody. I have updated to binutils-2.18.50.0.6-2.ppc and now
it works again on QS22 and JS21.
So I checked your binary, and the only differences between
D'oh. I spent so much time and the solution is so easy.
Thanks everybody. I have updated to binutils-2.18.50.0.6-2.ppc and now
it works again on QS22 and JS21.
So I checked your binary, and the only differences between working and
not-working are a) some section offsets in the file, and b) the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 09:45:32AM +1000, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
Somehow I expect that I am doing something wrong, because nobody else
has reported something like this yet.
Seems to work fine here - just booted 945754a on a QS22 with
cell_defconfig:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/version
I have a custom config to build a kernel which runs on JS21/QS21/QS22.
Starting with 2.6.26-rc1 that fails on JS21 (with SLOF). Bisecting lead
me to the following commit:
commit 366234f657879aeb7a1e2ca582f2f24f3fae9269
Author: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:52:28 2008
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:45 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
I have a custom config to build a kernel which runs on JS21/QS21/QS22.
Starting with 2.6.26-rc1 that fails on JS21 (with SLOF). Bisecting lead
me to the following commit:
commit 366234f657879aeb7a1e2ca582f2f24f3fae9269
Author: Kumar
Finalizing device tree... using OF tree (promptr=0e1004c4)
( 700 ) Program Exception [ e1004c4 ]
The program check exception happens at 0xe1004c4 ? That looks like the
OF entry point (promptr)... could it be possible that it got corrupted
somewhat ? The only thing I see above there would be
