Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC] (almost) booting allyesconfig -- please don't poke super-io without request_region

2008-07-13 Thread Hans de Goede
David Hubbard wrote: Hi Hans, Milton, Jean, On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:27:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Hans, hi Milton, snip One could make a superio driver, and create

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] task_pt_regs for powerpc systems

2008-07-13 Thread Paul Mackerras
Srinivasa D S writes: task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for upcoming utrace features. Below attached patch defines this macro for powerpc arch. Please let me know your comments on this.

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] task_pt_regs for powerpc systems

2008-07-13 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 08:32 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Srinivasa D S writes: task_pt_regs() macro defines pt_regs for the given task, this macro is currently not defined for powerpc arch. We need this macro for upcoming utrace features. Below attached patch defines this macro

Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC] (almost) booting allyesconfig -- please don't poke super-io without request_region

2008-07-13 Thread David Hubbard
Hi Hans, Milton, Jean, On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:27:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Hans, hi Milton, snip One could make a superio driver, and create sub-devices for the IR,

Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC] (almost) booting allyesconfig -- please don't poke super-io without request_region

2008-07-13 Thread David Hubbard
Hi Hans, I propose writing a subsystem driver. (Is that properly called The SuperIO Bus Driver?) If no one thinks it's a really bad idea I will put together some code and submit it for review, and maintain it. Some hwmon chips have odd / unique probe sequences. IMHO this is where the design

Re: Mikrotik RouterBoard 333

2008-07-13 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Grant Likely wrote: On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:26:32PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: Does anyone on this list have contacts with the makers of this board? Its firmware apparently provides a flattened device tree to the OS. And while this step towards world domination is flattering, it's an

Re: Updates to powerpc.git

2008-07-13 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:34 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: It contains 3 branches: - merge : this is for merging with the current stable and doesn't currently contain anything interesting - master : this is our current powerpc.git tree, it may contain

linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree

2008-07-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, Ben, Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in arch/powerpc/Kconfig between commit 4e491d14f2506b218d678935c25a7027b79178b1 (ftrace: support for PowerPC) from the ftrace tree and commit 3affedc4e1ce837033b6c5e9289d2ce2f5a62d31 (powerpc/dma: implement new

Re: Updates to powerpc.git

2008-07-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Ben, On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:36 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -next and -merge are now both to the same level, which is the same I think you meant -master (not -merge). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]