On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:53:46AM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > > @@ -3937,6 +3944,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q,
> > > > struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> > > > struct request *req;
> > > > struct fc_bsg_job *job;
> > > > enum fc_dispatch
> On 10/28/2016 01:31 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On 10/28/2016 11:53 AM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> >> On 10/13/2016 06:24 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
...
> fc_bsg_request_handler()
> req->errors = -ENXI
On 10/28/2016 01:31 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/28/2016 11:53 AM, Steffen Maier wrote:
On 10/13/2016 06:24 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
I'm puzzled.
$ git bisect start fc_bsg master
3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1cae
On 10/28/2016 11:53 AM, Steffen Maier wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2016 06:24 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
>>> I'm puzzled.
>>>
>>> $ git bisect start fc_bsg master
>
3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1caef18 is the first bad commit
On 10/13/2016 06:24 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
I'm puzzled.
$ git bisect start fc_bsg master
3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1caef18 is the first bad commit
commit 3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1caef18
Author: Johannes T
I'm puzzled.
$ git bisect start fc_bsg master
Bisecting: 8 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps)
[005d51510eee6102636d5dbb06310531c5d46151] scsi: fc: implement kref
backed reference counting
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 3 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
[bef6da2
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
> I'm puzzled.
>
> $ git bisect start fc_bsg master
> Bisecting: 8 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps)
> [005d51510eee6102636d5dbb06310531c5d46151] scsi: fc: implement kref backed
> reference counting
> $ git bisect bad
On 10/12/2016 03:06 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use
> helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when
> transitioning to bsg-lib.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
> ---
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.
Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use
helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when
transitioning to bsg-lib.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 9 +-
drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_bsg.c | 40 +++---