Remove incorrect comment about real mode address restrictions on
powernv (bare metal), and unnecessary clamping to ppc64_rma_size.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
index cad6b57ce494..caf60583293a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
@@ -162,12 +162,9 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_recoverable_ranges(unsigned 
long node,
                        sizeof(struct mcheck_recoverable_range);
 
        /*
-        * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges. We would be
-        * accessing them in real mode, hence it needs to be within
-        * RMO region.
+        * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges.
         */
-       mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc_base(size, __alignof__(u64),
-                                                       ppc64_rma_size));
+       mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc(size, __alignof__(u64)));
        memset(mc_recoverable_range, 0, size);
 
        for (i = 0; i < mc_recoverable_range_len; i++) {
-- 
2.13.3

Reply via email to