Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] kunit: bug: Count suppressed warning backtraces

2025-03-29 Thread David Gow
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 19:44, Alessandro Carminati  wrote:
>
> From: Guenter Roeck 
>
> Count suppressed warning backtraces to enable code which suppresses
> warning backtraces to check if the expected backtrace(s) have been
> observed.
>
> Using atomics for the backtrace count resulted in build errors on some
> architectures due to include file recursion, so use a plain integer
> for now.
>
> Acked-by: Dan Carpenter 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow 
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati 
> ---

Looks good. I'd definitely prefer the atomics to work one day, but I
doubt we're likely to have backtraces from multiple threads happening
in a KUnit test, so it's definitely not urgent.

Reviewed-by: David Gow 

Cheers,
-- David


>  include/kunit/bug.h | 7 ++-
>  lib/kunit/bug.c | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/bug.h b/include/kunit/bug.h
> index 0a8e62c1fcaf..44efa7d5c902 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/bug.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/bug.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  struct __suppressed_warning {
> struct list_head node;
> const char *function;
> +   int counter;
>  };
>
>  void __kunit_start_suppress_warning(struct __suppressed_warning *warning);
> @@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(const char *function);
>
>  #define DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)\
> struct __suppressed_warning __kunit_suppress_##func = \
> -   { .function = __stringify(func) }
> +   { .function = __stringify(func), .counter = 0 }
>
>  #define KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) \
> __kunit_start_suppress_warning(&__kunit_suppress_##func)
> @@ -39,12 +40,16 @@ bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(const char *function);
>  #define KUNIT_IS_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) \
> __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(func)
>
> +#define SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(func) \
> +   (__kunit_suppress_##func.counter)
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE */
>
>  #define DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
>  #define KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
>  #define KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
>  #define KUNIT_IS_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) (false)
> +#define SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(func) (0)
>
>  #endif /* CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE */
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/bug.c b/lib/kunit/bug.c
> index 351f9a595a71..84c05b1a9e8b 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/bug.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/bug.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,10 @@ bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(const char *function)
> return false;
>
> list_for_each_entry(warning, &suppressed_warnings, node) {
> -   if (!strcmp(function, warning->function))
> +   if (!strcmp(function, warning->function)) {
> +   warning->counter++;
> return true;
> +   }
> }
> return false;
>  }
> --
> 2.34.1
>


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[PATCH v4 02/14] kunit: bug: Count suppressed warning backtraces

2025-03-13 Thread Alessandro Carminati
From: Guenter Roeck 

Count suppressed warning backtraces to enable code which suppresses
warning backtraces to check if the expected backtrace(s) have been
observed.

Using atomics for the backtrace count resulted in build errors on some
architectures due to include file recursion, so use a plain integer
for now.

Acked-by: Dan Carpenter 
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook 
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing 
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck 
Reviewed-by: David Gow 
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati 
---
 include/kunit/bug.h | 7 ++-
 lib/kunit/bug.c | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/bug.h b/include/kunit/bug.h
index 0a8e62c1fcaf..44efa7d5c902 100644
--- a/include/kunit/bug.h
+++ b/include/kunit/bug.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 struct __suppressed_warning {
struct list_head node;
const char *function;
+   int counter;
 };
 
 void __kunit_start_suppress_warning(struct __suppressed_warning *warning);
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(const char *function);
 
 #define DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)\
struct __suppressed_warning __kunit_suppress_##func = \
-   { .function = __stringify(func) }
+   { .function = __stringify(func), .counter = 0 }
 
 #define KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) \
__kunit_start_suppress_warning(&__kunit_suppress_##func)
@@ -39,12 +40,16 @@ bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(const char *function);
 #define KUNIT_IS_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) \
__kunit_is_suppressed_warning(func)
 
+#define SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(func) \
+   (__kunit_suppress_##func.counter)
+
 #else /* CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE */
 
 #define DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
 #define KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
 #define KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
 #define KUNIT_IS_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) (false)
+#define SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(func) (0)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE */
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/lib/kunit/bug.c b/lib/kunit/bug.c
index 351f9a595a71..84c05b1a9e8b 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/bug.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/bug.c
@@ -32,8 +32,10 @@ bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning(const char *function)
return false;
 
list_for_each_entry(warning, &suppressed_warnings, node) {
-   if (!strcmp(function, warning->function))
+   if (!strcmp(function, warning->function)) {
+   warning->counter++;
return true;
+   }
}
return false;
 }
-- 
2.34.1