Re: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
Hi, On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:14:46PM +0300, Tatyana Brokhman wrote: Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org I need a sensible commit log for this. Why do we need to change all min() to min_t() ? -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:14:46PM +0300, Tatyana Brokhman wrote: Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org I need a sensible commit log for this. Why do we need to change all min() to min_t() ? Actually, Alan asked me to make this change in one place in dummy_hcd. I wasn't aware of the min_t macro before that. So when I searched the code for other places I found quite a few and just thought that it would be nicer to use min_t() instead of min() with casting. So we don't need to make this change. Everything works as is. This patch only makes the code look nicer, nothing more. I can elaborate the above in the commit log if you want. Thanks, Tanya Brokhman --- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
Hi, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:52:34PM +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:14:46PM +0300, Tatyana Brokhman wrote: Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org I need a sensible commit log for this. Why do we need to change all min() to min_t() ? Actually, Alan asked me to make this change in one place in dummy_hcd. I wasn't aware of the min_t macro before that. So when I searched the code for other places I found quite a few and just thought that it would be nicer to use min_t() instead of min() with casting. So we don't need to make this change. Everything works as is. This patch only makes the code look nicer, nothing more. I can elaborate the above in the commit log if you want. Yes, that's what I need. The question was supposed to be answered by the commit log ;-) -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tanya Brokhman wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:14:46PM +0300, Tatyana Brokhman wrote: Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org I need a sensible commit log for this. Why do we need to change all min() to min_t() ? Actually, Alan asked me to make this change in one place in dummy_hcd. I wasn't aware of the min_t macro before that. So when I searched the code for other places I found quite a few and just thought that it would be nicer to use min_t() instead of min() with casting. So we don't need to make this change. Everything works as is. This patch only makes the code look nicer, nothing more. I can elaborate the above in the commit log if you want. The change I suggested involved replacing two typecasts with a single min_t. All (or almost all) the places this patch touches currently contain only one typecast, so the motivation for changing them is a lot weaker. Alan Stern ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
The change I suggested involved replacing two typecasts with a single min_t. All (or almost all) the places this patch touches currently contain only one typecast, so the motivation for changing them is a lot weaker. You're right. So what's the final call on this one? Do you think it can be merged or you prefer not change anything? I personally think the code looks nicer using min_t instead of min with casting but that's just my opinion and of course there are arguments against this patch. Thanks, Tanya Brokhman --- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
RE: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tanya Brokhman wrote: The change I suggested involved replacing two typecasts with a single min_t. All (or almost all) the places this patch touches currently contain only one typecast, so the motivation for changing them is a lot weaker. You're right. So what's the final call on this one? Do you think it can be merged or you prefer not change anything? I personally think the code looks nicer using min_t instead of min with casting but that's just my opinion and of course there are arguments against this patch. I don't care either way. It's up to you and Felipe. Alan Stern ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
Hi, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:03:44PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: The change I suggested involved replacing two typecasts with a single min_t. All (or almost all) the places this patch touches currently contain only one typecast, so the motivation for changing them is a lot weaker. You're right. So what's the final call on this one? Do you think it can be merged or you prefer not change anything? I personally think the code looks nicer using min_t instead of min with casting but that's just my opinion and of course there are arguments against this patch. I don't care either way. It's up to you and Felipe. I guess it's better to have a more critical look at the arguments first. Looking into dummy_hcd for instance, it doesn't appear like we need to be int, it could be unsigned int. I just skimmed through the code, but it looks like we will always hold = 0 values on that variable. So go through that exercise first, then we look at the others. Blindly changing to min_t() might not give us any improvements at all ;-) -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
