Thanks for reviewing this patch Fred,
Frederic Barrat writes:
> So we are calling functions with an invalid afu argument. We can verify
> in the callees the value of the afu pointer, like you're doing here, but
> why not tackle it at source and avoid calling the function in the first
> place?
Le 08/03/2018 à 11:05, Vaibhav Jain a écrit :
It is possible for a CXL card to have a valid PSL but no valid
AFUs. When this happens we have a valid instance of 'struct cxl'
representing the adapter but with its member 'struct cxl_afu *cxl[]'
as empty. Unfortunately at many placed within cxl co
On 09/03/18 13:59, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
Thanks for looking into this patch Andrew,
Andrew Donnellan writes:
On 08/03/18 21:05, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
It is possible for a CXL card to have a valid PSL but no valid
AFUs. When this happens we have a valid instance of 'struct cxl'
representing the a
Thanks for looking into this patch Andrew,
Andrew Donnellan writes:
> On 08/03/18 21:05, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> It is possible for a CXL card to have a valid PSL but no valid
>> AFUs. When this happens we have a valid instance of 'struct cxl'
>> representing the adapter but with its member 'stru
On 08/03/18 21:05, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
It is possible for a CXL card to have a valid PSL but no valid
AFUs. When this happens we have a valid instance of 'struct cxl'
representing the adapter but with its member 'struct cxl_afu *cxl[]'
as empty. Unfortunately at many placed within cxl code (espec
