On Tue, 11 May 2021 06:08:06 + (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit 328e7e487a46 ("powerpc: force inlining of csum_partial() to
> avoid multiple csum_partial() with GCC10") inlined csum_partial().
>
> Now that csum_partial() is inlined, GCC outlines csum_add() when
> called by
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 04:43:33PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 12/05/2021 à 16:31, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>Le 11/05/2021 à 12:51, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >>>Something seems to have decided this asm is more
Le 12/05/2021 à 16:31, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 11/05/2021 à 12:51, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
Something seems to have decided this asm is more expensive than it is.
That isn't always avoidable -- the compiler cannot
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 11/05/2021 à 12:51, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >Something seems to have decided this asm is more expensive than it is.
> >That isn't always avoidable -- the compiler cannot look inside asms --
> >but it seems it could be
Hi,
Le 11/05/2021 à 12:51, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
Hi!
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:08:06AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Commit 328e7e487a46 ("powerpc: force inlining of csum_partial() to
avoid multiple csum_partial() with GCC10") inlined csum_partial().
Now that csum_partial() is
Hi!
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:08:06AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit 328e7e487a46 ("powerpc: force inlining of csum_partial() to
> avoid multiple csum_partial() with GCC10") inlined csum_partial().
>
> Now that csum_partial() is inlined, GCC outlines csum_add() when
> called by
