Hi Stewart,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 04:35:35PM +1100, Stewart Smith wrote:
>
> What if we just treat the 0xF state from firmware as special and set it
> to DEFAULT_PSSCR_MASK in that case? That deals with old skiboot, new
> kernel, and sets a pretty small special case that's easy to track into
>
Gautham R Shenoy writes:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:33:27PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/16 21:32, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
>> >
>> >> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>> >>
Hi Balbir, Michael,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:33:27PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 04/10/16 21:32, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
> >
> >> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >>
> >> The power9_idle_stop method
On 04/10/16 21:32, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
>
>> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>>
>> The power9_idle_stop method currently takes only the requested stop
>> level as a parameter and picks up the rest of the PSSCR bits
"Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> The power9_idle_stop method currently takes only the requested stop
> level as a parameter and picks up the rest of the PSSCR bits from a
> hand-coded macro. This is not a very flexible