On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Brian Gerst wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:13 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I'd rather keep it in common code as that
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:13 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > I'd rather keep it in common code as that allows all the low-level
> > exec stuff to be marked static, and
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:33:49AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> If you move those aliases above all the __SYSCALL_* defines it will
> work, since that will get the forward declaration too. This would be
> the simplest workaround.
That compiles and also passes my exaustive x32 tests (chroot + ls
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:10 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > How about this one:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> > index 3d8d70d3896c..0ce15807cf54 100644
> > ---
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> How about this one:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> index 3d8d70d3896c..0ce15807cf54 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:13 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > > - if (unlikely(argv.is_compat)) {
> > > + if (in_compat_syscall()) {
> > > + const compat_uptr_t __user
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:43 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:40:28PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > ld: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o:(.rodata+0x1040): undefined reference to
> > > `__x32_sys_execve'
> > > ld: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o:(.rodata+0x1108): undefined
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:12 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > I don't really understand
> > the comment, why can't this just use this?
>
> That errors out with:
>
> ld: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o:(.rodata+0x1040): undefined
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:40:28PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ld: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o:(.rodata+0x1040): undefined reference to
> > `__x32_sys_execve'
> > ld: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o:(.rodata+0x1108): undefined reference to
> > `__x32_sys_execveat'
> > make: *** [Makefile:1139:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > - if (unlikely(argv.is_compat)) {
> > + if (in_compat_syscall()) {
> > + const compat_uptr_t __user *compat_argv =
> > + compat_ptr((unsigned long)argv);
> >
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> The only differenence betweeen the compat exec* syscalls and their
> native versions is that compat_ptr sign extension, and the fact that
> the pointer arithmetics for the two dimensional arrays needs to use
> the compat pointer size.
11 matches
Mail list logo
