Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 8:30 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We still treat devices without a DMA mask as defaulting to 32-bits for
> both mask, but a few releases ago we've started warning about such
> cases, as they require special cases to work around this sloppyness.
> Add a
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:38:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:03:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct platform_device {
> > > int
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:03:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct platform_device {
> > int id;
> > boolid_auto;
> > struct device dev;
> > +
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> because we have to support platform_device structures that are
>> statically allocated.
>
> This would be a good point to also get rid of the long-standing bodge in
> platform_device_register_full().
platform_device_register_full
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We still treat devices without a DMA mask as defaulting to 32-bits for
> both mask, but a few releases ago we've started warning about such
> cases, as they require special cases to work around this sloppyness.
> Add a dma_mask
On 11/08/2019 09:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We still treat devices without a DMA mask as defaulting to 32-bits for
both mask, but a few releases ago we've started warning about such
cases, as they require special cases to work around this sloppyness.
Add a dma_mask field to struct
