* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 10:42 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> > Linus, you rejected resolveat() because you wanted a *nice* API
>
> No. I rejected resoveat() because it was a completely broken garbage
> API that couldn't do even basic stuff right (like O_CREAT).
>
>
On 2019-09-07, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 06:19 +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > + * @flags: O_* flags.
> > + * @mode: O_CREAT/O_TMPFILE file mode.
> > + * @upgrade_mask: UPGRADE_* flags (to restrict O_PATH re-opening).
> > + * @resolve: RESOLVE_* flags.
> > + */
> > +struct
> On Sep 7, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 10:42 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Linus, you rejected resolveat() because you wanted a *nice* API
>
> No. I rejected resoveat() because it was a completely broken garbage
> API that couldn't do even
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 10:42 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Linus, you rejected resolveat() because you wanted a *nice* API
No. I rejected resoveat() because it was a completely broken garbage
API that couldn't do even basic stuff right (like O_CREAT).
We have a ton of flag space in the new
> On Sep 7, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 5:40 AM Jeff Layton wrote:
>>
>> After thinking about this a bit, I wonder if we might be better served
>> with a new set of OA2_* flags instead of repurposing the O_* flags?
>
> I'd hate to have yet
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 5:40 AM Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> After thinking about this a bit, I wonder if we might be better served
> with a new set of OA2_* flags instead of repurposing the O_* flags?
I'd hate to have yet _another_ set of translation functions, and
another chance of people just
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 06:19 +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> The most obvious syscall to add support for the new LOOKUP_* scoping
> flags would be openat(2). However, there are a few reasons why this is
> not the best course of action:
>
> * The new LOOKUP_* flags are intended to be security
Hi,
just noisy nits here:
On 9/4/19 1:19 PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> index 1d338357df8a..479baf2da10e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> @@ -93,5 +93,47 @@
>
> #define AT_RECURSIVE
