On 10/04/2018 08:47, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>>> Aside: should there be a new spec_flt field for struct task_struct that
>>> complements maj_flt and min_flt and be exported through /proc/pid/stat?
>>
>> No. task_struct is already too bloated. If you need p
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Aside: should there be a new spec_flt field for struct task_struct that
> > complements maj_flt and min_flt and be exported through /proc/pid/stat?
>
> No. task_struct is already too bloated. If you need per process tracking
> you can always get it thr
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 02:44:48PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>
> > Add support for the new speculative faults event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes
>
> Aside: should there be a new spec_flt field for struct ta
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> Add support for the new speculative faults event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Aside: should there be a new spec_flt field for struct task_struct that
complements maj_flt and min_flt and be exported through /proc/pid/
