Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-09-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:12:00 PDT, Paul E. McKenney said: On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:22:12PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, The following suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage is detected during 2.6.35-stable boot on my ppc64/p7 machine: = [ INFO:

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-09-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 11:12 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: Ping? I just hit it on 2.6.36-rc4-mmotm0915. Just wanted to make sure the issue hadn't been lost/forgotten. lost,.. thanks! ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-09-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: [0.051203] CPU0: AMD QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.12.4 stepping 03 [0.052999] lockdep: fixing up alternatives. [0.054105] [0.054106] === [0.054999] [ INFO:

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-09-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:50:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: [0.051203] CPU0: AMD QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.12.4 stepping 03 [0.052999] lockdep: fixing up alternatives. [0.054105] [0.054106]

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-09-16 Thread Subrata Modak
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:50:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: [0.051203] CPU0: AMD QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.12.4 stepping 03 [0.052999] lockdep: fixing up

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-08-13 Thread Subrata Modak
Hi Paul, Is there any specific person(s) whom we whom we should direct this mail to ? We have not received any response from CGROUP developers on this. Kindly let me know whom to contact for this. I am adding few more people i know :-) Regards-- Subrata On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:12 -0700, Paul

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-08-13 Thread Dhaval Giani
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Subrata Modak subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi Paul, Is there any specific person(s) whom we whom we should direct this mail to ? We have not received any response from CGROUP developers on this. Kindly let me know whom to contact for this. I am adding few

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-08-13 Thread Subrata Modak
Adding CONTROL GROUP Maintainers/Mailing list.. Regards-- Subrata On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:22:12PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, The following suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage is detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-08-09 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:22:12PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, The following suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage is detected during 2.6.35-stable boot on my ppc64/p7 machine: == [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]

Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot

2010-08-04 Thread Subrata Modak
Peter/Li, Did you get a chance to see this ? Regards-- Subrata On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 14:22 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, The following suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage is detected during 2.6.35-stable boot on my ppc64/p7 machine: