Roland Dreier wrote:
> We have a PowerPC 440GP-based design running Linux. Right now our
> kernel and applications are built with gcc for a "405" target
> (essentially by using the -m405 flag).
>
> This works fine, and all of our executables run with no problem.
> However, we are interested in op
Mark> I am not a tools expert by any means.. but from my
Mark> understanding there is work to support the 440 specific
Mark> items.
Mark> However, I believe the work is focused on enhancing binutils
Mark> (the assembler) and not the compiler. So any 440 specific
Mark> opt
We have a PowerPC 440GP-based design running Linux. Right now our
kernel and applications are built with gcc for a "405" target
(essentially by using the -m405 flag).
This works fine, and all of our executables run with no problem.
However, we are interested in optimizing specifically for the 44
