uxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: xilinx Ml405 NFS mount problem
Can you test your packet loss with your setup??
GigE or 100T??
Do you have hardware checksum turned on in your bitfile?
I strongly believe that there is a timing problem in the MPMC3/LL_TEMAC.
I think the smaller FX12 does not suff
u're in. You may want to talk
to your FAE as to possible hw timing issues.
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Woodworth
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:44 PM
To: John Linn
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE:
John Linn; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: xilinx Ml405 NFS mount problem
>
> I think you may be suffering from the latest LL_TEMAC packet loss
> problem. (NFS/UDP really does not like packet loss)
>
>
> Let me guess.
> You are using a base system from "
er idea or suggestion? Thanks in advance.
BR
Ming
> Subject: RE: xilinx Ml405 NFS mount problem> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org> Date:
> Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:50:18 -0600> > I think you may be sufferi
Dear Robert> Let me guess. > You are using a base system from "Base System
Builder Wizard"?> EDK 9.2i. Default syntheses/P&R options.
I am using EDK 10.1 evaluation version (60 days) from Xilinx. I don't have
experience on EDK 9.2 and previously I was working on EDK 8.2.
> I have seen a massive
I think you may be suffering from the latest LL_TEMAC packet loss
problem. (NFS/UDP really does not like packet loss)
Let me guess.
You are using a base system from "Base System Builder Wizard"?
EDK 9.2i. Default syntheses/P&R options.
I have seen a massive packet loss problems on my ML403 an
AM
To: MingLiu
Cc: John Linn; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: xilinx Ml405 NFS mount problem
I think you may be suffering from the latest LL_TEMAC packet loss
problem. (NFS/UDP really does not like packet loss)
Let me guess.
You are using a base system from "Base System Builder Wi
Dear John,
Thank you for your replying.
>It’s not obvious to me what the problem is as I don’t see any driver failures.
>Have you >tried using a ramdisk and then seeing if the network is working
>before using NFS root?
Not yet. I will try it soon. However from the information on the LL_TE
Hi Ming,
It’s not obvious to me what the problem is as I don’t see any driver failures.
Have you tried using a ramdisk and then seeing if the network is working before
using NFS root?
And I’m assuming you have used the NFS root before so you know that it’s good
for sure.
I test on
