[RFC][PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 1/3] FCC Ethernet PlatformDevice support for 82xx

2005-05-04 Thread Vitaly Bordug
Name: basic_platform.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 10939 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050504/130714e5/attachment.bin

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 2/3] FCC Ethernet PlatformDevice support for 82xx

2005-05-04 Thread Vitaly Bordug
-patch Size: 2793 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050504/c3af4f72/attachment.bin

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 3/3] FCC Ethernet PlatformDevice support for 82xx

2005-05-04 Thread Vitaly Bordug
Desc: not available Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050504/b05a25a6/attachment.bin

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 1/3] FCC Ethernet PlatformDevice support for 82xx

2005-05-04 Thread Eugene Surovegin
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:35:16PM +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > This patch adds generic PlatformDevice support to the 82xx family. > Only FCC's exist currently in the structure, as there is the driver > which will utilize this. > [snip] > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPM2 > + identify_ppc_sys_by_id(cpm2

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 2/3] FCC Ethernet PlatformDevice support for 82xx

2005-05-04 Thread Dan Malek
On May 4, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > This patch adds some helper functions to the common CPM2 code in order > to prevent > direct *immr usage within network driver. No, please don't do this. We don't need "helper" functions for the IO port in this manner. I've got a new scheme th

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 3/3] FCC Ethernet PlatformDevice support for 82xx

2005-05-04 Thread Dan Malek
On May 4, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > This patch contains actual Ethernet driver on platform bus. Currently > tested on MPC8272ADS (PQII) board. Hold off on this, please. We need to get Panto to review it against the restructuring of all of the existing drivers. Thanks.

CONFIG_PIN_TLB experiments

2005-05-04 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
Hi, On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:14:39AM -0700, Conn Clark wrote: > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >Hi 8xx folks, > > > > > > >Actually, CONFIG_PIN_TLB slowdowns the system, as expected (there are only > >28 usable TLB's instead of 32). > > > > > >v2.6 CONFIG_PIN_TLB: > >I-TLB userspace misses: 162113