MPC885 - USB HCI drivers.

Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Well I have USB host drivers for both 8xx 82xx working. Bastos Fernandez Alexandre wrote: Finally, was the patch submitted to the list? I have searched deeply both ozlabs and gmane, but I couldn't find it ... I'd be keen for a look at

RMII support for MPC8280

Hi. Has anybody made u-boot (1.1.2) with support for RMII on the MPC8280? The code currently only supports the MII interface. /Tore

Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ?

Keith J Outwater wrote: Hello all - I am designing an embedded system using a Xilinx Virtex II Pro FPGA. Can anyone point me to the best kernel source tree to use ? Best in this case means: 1. A 2.4 series kernel with good support for Xilinx peripheral devices (existing Xilinx ML300

[PATCH] identify_ppc_sys_by_name_and_id function implementation final

Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 12, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: Kumar Gala wrote: Can you do a sizeof instead? #define num_ele sizeof(ppc_sys_specs[])/sizeof(struct ppc_sys_spec) Something like matchted[num_ele] ?? That's what the first I tried actually :) gcc is not happy with

[PATCH] Support 440EP On-Chip OHCI USB Host Controller (v3)

This updated patch adds support for the AMCC 440EP on-chip OHCI USB host controller. I tested it on the Bamboo board using the 2.6.13-rc6 kernel. I'm cross posting this to linux-usb-devel. Let me know if that's a mistake. This patch depends on my fix invalid function name usb_hcd_put in

Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ?

Hi Andrei - Just to be clear: we are talking about linuxppc-2.4 NOT linuxppc_2_4_devel, right? Keith Andrei Konovalov akonovalov at ru.mvista.com wrote on 08/16/2005 03:38:39 AM: Keith J Outwater wrote: Hello all - I am designing an embedded system using a Xilinx Virtex II Pro FPGA.

Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ?

Keith J Outwater wrote: Hi Andrei - Just to be clear: we are talking about linuxppc-2.4 NOT linuxppc_2_4_devel, right? Correct. Thanks, Andrei Keith Andrei Konovalov akonovalov at ru.mvista.com wrote on 08/16/2005 03:38:39 AM: Keith J Outwater wrote: Hello all - I am designing

Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ?

Thanks Andrei. Last question: do you know of any non bitkeeper repositories? I'm stuck behind a firewall here. Thanks, Keith Andrei Konovalov akonovalov at ru.mvista.com wrote on 08/16/2005 09:15:04 AM: Keith J Outwater wrote: Hi Andrei - Just to be clear: we are talking about

Best kernel for Xilinx VirtexII Pro/PPC405 ?

Hi Peter - Yes, I have looked at both xapp765 and xapp542. In order to get the kernel source mentioned in the app note, I have to get the Monta Vista preview kit and get it installed. The preview kit will not install under Fedora Core 4 - the encryption stuff is broken (and the fix in the

[PATCH] ppc32: add 440GX rev.F cputable entry

Add PowerPC 440GX rev.F cputable entry. Signed-off-by: Eugene Surovegin ebs at ebshome.net diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c @@ -922,6 +922,16 @@ struct cpu_speccpu_specs[] = {

[PATCH] PPC: Don't sleep in flush_dcache_icache_page()

flush_dcache_icache_page() will be called on an instruction page fault. We can't sleep in the fault handler, so use kmap_atomic() instead of just kmap() for the Book-E case. Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier rolandd at cisco.com diff --git a/arch/ppc/mm/init.c b/arch/ppc/mm/init.c ---

Redwood-6 and 2.6

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:25:10PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:28:19PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: Hi! Redwood-6 support in 2.6 is broken. I subscribed to this list just to know if somebody is working on it? 2.4.30 works ok. I went ahead and fixed this

Redwood-6 and 2.6

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:12:59PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:25:10PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:28:19PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: Hi! Redwood-6 support in 2.6 is broken. I subscribed to this list just to know if somebody is

[PATCH] ppc32: Fix PPC440SP SRAM controller DCRs

Fixes the incorrect DCR base value for the 440SP SRAM controller. Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mporter at kernel.crashing.org diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/ibm44x.h b/include/asm-ppc/ibm44x.h --- a/include/asm-ppc/ibm44x.h +++ b/include/asm-ppc/ibm44x.h @@ -423,11 +423,7 @@ #define

[PATCH] ppc32: add cputable entry for 440SP Rev. A

Adds the appropriate cputable entry for PPC440SP so cache line sizes are configured correctly. Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mporter at kernel.crashing.org diff --git a/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c @@

What's wrong with the serial port?

When the kernel is booting, it gets to the point where console_init() is called, which calls individual early console initialization functions. In my case it's serial8250_console_init(). Before register_console() is called in serial8250_console_init(), everything seems fine because the

Redwood-6 and 2.6

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:19:08PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:12:59PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: Now, when 'make znetboot' in 2.4 there was a zImage.embedded, is the same thing as zImage.treebot that appears now in 2.6? Yes, this is the image that boots on the

Redwood-6 and 2.6

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:47:45AM +, Otto Solares wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:19:08PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:12:59PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: Now, when 'make znetboot' in 2.4 there was a zImage.embedded, is the same thing as zImage.treebot that

Redwood-6 and 2.6

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:47:45PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:19:08PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:12:59PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: Now, when 'make znetboot' in 2.4 there was a zImage.embedded, is the same thing as zImage.treebot that