An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060412/e5bfc794/attachment.htm
Hi list,
I am trying to use the on-chip watchdog timer in the MPC8248 to
recover from system hangs.
I have been following the guidelines from the changes I have found
from Compulab.
In u-boot, the watchdog is activated and works fine. The changes in
the kernel are, basically, assigning the ppd_
> So, can anyone give me some guidelines for this job? I have seen from
> freescale docs that MPC83xx watchdog may be the same than MPC82xx one.
> So, could I use the same approach than used on MPC83xx boards?
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc//patch?id=4118
>
Though Freescales doc for MPC
Hello,
I have a general question regarding having a root file system mounted
via NFS. Our system consists of a linux PC that acts as the NFS server
and two embedded ppc boards running linux that mount their file systems
via NFS. The problem is that the embedded boards boot much faster than
t
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 15:35, Randy Smith wrote:
Hi,
If your system configuration is static why not just sleep in the bootloader
for a while? U-boot has sleep command.
- Jarno
> Hello,
>
> I have a general question regarding having a root file system mounted
> via NFS. Our system consists
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 07:35, Randy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a general question regarding having a root file system mounted
> via NFS. Our system consists of a linux PC that acts as the NFS server
> and two embedded ppc boards running linux that mount their file systems
> via NFS. The
DG Antwerpen Belgium
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060412/c5c64d81/attachment.htm
Brent Cook wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 April 2006 07:35, Randy Smith wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a general question regarding having a root file system mounted
>> via NFS. Our system consists of a linux PC that acts as the NFS server
>> and two embedded ppc boards running linux that mount th
Hi,
I'm trying to run U-Boot 1.1.4 on original 440EP Bamboo board and have two
major problems:
1. Ethernets don't work, just "Net: No ethernet found" on boot. In PIBS
works.
2. When trying to boot uImage (loaded via USB, as eth doesn't work), it just
hang after "Uncompressing Kernel Image ..
Grant,
I know I could probably figure this out by looking at the GIT tree
directly (which I'm planning to do) but could you summarize how much
(which devices) of the ML-403 is supported by your patches?
Serial? (which Xilinx core)
Ethernet? (Hard-Core PLB TEMAC?, Soft-Core PLB EMAC? Localink TEM
's GIT tree ? Just curious ...
>>
>>
>
>rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git
>
>g.
>
>--
>Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
>Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
>(403) 399-0195
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HT
On 4/12/06, Vincent Winstead wrote:
> Thanks for the info! Now I installed rsync onto this computer with
> configure, then make, then make install and everything seemed to install
> correctly. Then i typed in:
>
> rsync rsync://source.mvista.com/linuxppc-2.4
>
> but it ended up showing a timed
On 4/12/06, Martin, Tim wrote:
> Grant,
>
> I know I could probably figure this out by looking at the GIT tree
> directly (which I'm planning to do) but could you summarize how much
> (which devices) of the ML-403 is supported by your patches?
>
> Serial? (which Xilinx core)
Yes, full uart
>
> Et
On 4/12/06, yding wrote:
> Is this Ethernet device supported by this patch ?
No, sorry. I'm still trying to get permission to release it (it's
internal only at the moment)
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
(403) 399-0195
In message <60E856FD577CC04BA3727AF4122D3F1601238501 at 3bit.vector.com.pl> you
wrote:
>
> Does anybody succeed to run U-Boot on this board?
Yes, see my reply on the U-Boot list.
Please note thet it is really bad manner to post the same question to
several mailing lists without any indication.
Please remember to CC the mailing list when replying
On 4/12/06, Vincent Winstead wrote:
>
>Now, what does that mean, to get the tree. Does it mean I'll get a list
> of possible kernels that I can download, and then i'll have to choose one of
> them to download?
It means you get a clone of
Hello Domenico,
* Domenico Andreoli [10-04-06 23:54]:
> unfortunately it does not :/
im sorry about it, but I'm a newbie too.
The only think I did is documenting how i got the kernel running. :(
> is there any way to force eth0 auto-negotiation?
maybe giving a parameter to the bootargs?
Maybe
> >
> > Ethernet? (Hard-Core PLB TEMAC?, Soft-Core PLB EMAC? Localink TEMAC?
Is
> > 10/100/1000 supported, or is there only 1 rate e.g. 1000 supported?)
>
> No. I've ported the 2.4 driver, but I haven't got permission to
> release it yet. (I'm a contractor; I don't own any of the work I do)
>
On 4/12/06, Martin, Tim wrote:
>
> Which 2.4 driver - there's the "Montavista" one for the softcore PLB
> EMAC, and there's also one for the hardcore PLB TEMAC that gets
> distributed with the GSRD.
The montavista softcore driver. Has someone written a driver for the TEMAC yet?
g.
--
Grant Lik
On 4/12/06, Vincent Winstead wrote:
>
> Very Interesting. Now I know what they were talking about on the sites that
> go through how to install the linux kernel onto the ML300. because in those
> method walk-throughs they show which options you should choose when doing a
> "make menuconfig" and
On 4/12/06, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Vincent Winstead wrote:
>
> > So, when you say that the "The linuxppc-2.4 tree is
> > special because it's one of the trees that actually has the ML300
> > patches integrated", are you implying that you could put these patches into
> > the system on
Yes, we have a driver for the PLB TEMAC (different than the GSRD LL
TEMAC) for Linux 2.4 (MontaVista Linux 2.4.20) that's shipped in EDK
8.1.1, and MontaVista is on the verge of publishing a driver for PLB
TEMAC for Linux 2.6. (I believe it came across this mailing list a few
weeks ago)
-Rick
--
Hi all,
I have a new Freescale 8272ADS board that I need to load uboot and linux
on. I have read all the documentation that came with the board but
unfortunately it doesn't explain how to bring up the board from scratch.
Does anyone know what I need to do to load uboot and linux on this board ?
On 4/12/06, Rick Moleres wrote:
>
> Yes, we have a driver for the PLB TEMAC (different than the GSRD LL
> TEMAC) for Linux 2.4 (MontaVista Linux 2.4.20) that's shipped in EDK
> 8.1.1, and MontaVista is on the verge of publishing a driver for PLB
> TEMAC for Linux 2.6. (I believe it came across thi
24 matches
Mail list logo
