-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Grant
Likely
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 4:02 AM
To: Li Yang-r58472; Tabi Timur-B04825; Behan Webster; Linux PPC Linux
PPC
Subject: mpc83xx USB support status
Li,
What is the state of mpc83xx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Ying Lin
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 12:02 AM
To: Tabi Timur-B04825
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: Anyone using QE UART mode?
OK, the missing piece (UART driver) I am looking for is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:11 PM
To: Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: USB Host at full speed
Hello ALL,
I m currently trying to force the USB host controller from
Hi Cedric,
For ppc embedded related patches, please also cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We use a kernel 2.6.14 on PPC platform (MPC 8555). The FCC driver
works
To submit a kernel patch upstream, the patch should be against the
latest kernel version which is 2.6.21-rc now.
well with a 100Mbps link. But
: MPC8260 I2C Problem
In the arch\ppc\syslib\pq2_devices.c, there has the
device descriptions.
Do I still need manually create the plateform bus
tree?
--- Li Yang-r58472 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Russ,
Please use the latest git tree. The fix has been merged.
- Leo
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Russell McGuire
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 2:07 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: 8360 UCC_GETH INIT_WORK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
jimmy liu
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:22 AM
To: embedded linuxppc
Subject: MPC8260 I2C Problem
I download the linux kernel 2.6.19 from
ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/linux/ site.
When I add
The irq number on powerpc ARCH is now a virtual number. This change was
introduced by Ben's irq mapping change in early 2.6.18-rc.
- Leo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Fredrik Roubert
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:41 AM
To:
i have a MPC8347E running with the Freescale E(F)HCI driver
and Kernel 2.6.17 (Freescale LTIB).
Because of this mail, i checked, if there are any periodical
interrupts, without real USB payload.
The result is: NO
If i attach a USB-mouse, i get 5 interrupts.
If i remove it again, 1
-Original Message-
From:
linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.o
rg] On Behalf Of Jamie Guinan
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 12:14 AM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: Rattler 8347
-Original Message-
From: Liu Dave-r63238
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:17 AM
To: Li Yang-r58472; linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org;
linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: atomic operations in user space
[snip]
I surely know all the theories you mentioned clearly
-Original Message-
From: Liu Dave-r63238
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:27 AM
To: Liu Dave-r63238; Li Yang-r58472; linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org;
linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: atomic operations in user space
[snip]
I surely know all the theories you mentioned
-Original Message-
From: Liu Dave-r63238
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 10:43 AM
To: Li Yang-r58472; 'linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org';
'linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org'
Subject: RE: RE: atomic operations in user space
[snip]
Is this your reason we cannot do atomic operation
-Original Message-
From:
linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.o
rg] On Behalf Of Reddy Suneel-ASR125
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 2:25 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: How to
Yang-r58472; Terry Liang
Subject: Re: atomic operations in user space
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:39, Li Yang-r58472
wrote:
Why do you need atomic operations in user land?
IPC will be
sufficient
to deal with race conditions between processes.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: Esben Nielsen [mailto:nielsen.esben at gogglemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:33 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Cc: Xupei Liang; linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: atomic operations in user space
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Li Yang-r58472 wrote
-Original Message-
From: Esben Nielsen [mailto:nielsen.esben at gogglemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 5:57 PM
To: Liu Dave-r63238
Cc: Li Yang-r58472; Esben Nielsen; Xupei Liang;
linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: atomic operations in user space
On Tue, 29
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of
Liu Dave-r63238
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 11:18 AM
To: Martin, Tim; ppc
Subject: RE: Cache coherency question
-Original Message-
From: Liu Dave-r63238
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 3:00 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472; 'Martin, Tim'; 'ppc'
Subject: RE: Cache coherency question
snip
Looking from source code, there is such problem for MV64360.
It's likely that MV54360 has the same problem
-Original Message-
From: Brent Cook [mailto:bcook at bpointsys.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:18 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Cc: Li Yang-r58472; Terry Liang
Subject: Re: atomic operations in user space
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:39, Li Yang-r58472 wrote
Why do you need atomic operations in user land? IPC will be sufficient
to deal with race conditions between processes.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of
Xu, Li (GE, Research)
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 4:02 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: I2C
ehci-fsl.c is included in ehci.c, not handled by Makefile.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of
Claus Gindhart
Sent: Friday, August 18,
I don't think kernel.img is a standard name for any kind of images.
Maybe you have to look into the content to find out which kind of image
it is.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
http://images.tomshardware.com/2006/06/28/not_going_wrong_with_the_synol
ogy_ds/synology_ds106e_main_board_big.jpg
Here is a picture of the exact model. I can confirm that it's a
MPC8241.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at
I'm not very familiar with SPI. See if someone on the list can help.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: Keinen Namen [mailto:GSM909 at gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 9:39 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Subject: Re: RE: RE: cpm_dpalloc
Thx, now it?s working fine.
But my
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of
Uros Borovsak
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 4:14 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Host USB on
There is a bug in rheap for alignment. The patch is still hanging around.
Search rheap and alignment on the linuxppc-dev list for patch previously posted.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: andreas Sotirakopoulos [mailto:menwn at yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:34 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Subject: Re: Linux bin Commands download
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 08:31, you wrote:
Thanks, I would like though to know... is rpm
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of Lei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:41 AM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: reboot on PQ2FADS board.
Are you sure the IRQ4 line is generating irqs? Did you measure the line
using an oscilloscope?
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf
Of
[mailto:jagannathanjay at aim.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 5:24 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Subject: Re: SIU_INT_IRQ4 in MPC 8260
No I haven't measured the IRQ4 line
I am newbie into MPC8260 .
Can u guide me as to what way I should proceed to get my interrupt
handler working?
Regards
Jagan
-Original Message-
From: Laurent Lagrange [mailto:lagrange at fr.oleane.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 4:26 PM
To: Li Yang-r58472; pantelis at embeddedalley.com
Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: Linux 2.6.x : cpm_dpalloc alignment bug perhaps not fully
resolved
That depends on how accurate you want. Sleep() functions can't be too accurate
for Linux schedule characteristic. To get best accuracy, you can use hardware
timer. udelay() is a choice which reduces the overall system performance.
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From:
I noticed that there is a new bus type of_platform_bus added. Current ppc
embedded systems are using platform_device, and are changing to use OF flat
device tree structure. Does it mean that current drivers need to be switched
from platform_bus to of_platform_bus?
--
Regards,
Leo
Hi,
The memory mappings for MPC8349 USB MPH and DR modules were reversed.
Signed-off-by: Li Yang LeoLi at freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Jiang Bo Tanya.jiang at freescale.com
---
--- arch/ppc/syslib/mpc83xx_devices.c.orig 2005-08-04 16:37:20.0
+0800
+++
Google probably will do the similar job
using: site:http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/ {keyword}
Best Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces at ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of
Sent:
Surovegin [mailto:ebs at ebshome.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:27 AM
To: Li Yang-r58472
Cc: Walter L. Wimer III; Gala Kumar K.-galak; Linux PPC Embedded list
Subject: Re: Problem running Linux 2.6.11 on MPC8272ADS
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:03:00AM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote
Hi,
I know this question is off topic, but I can't find a better place to ask. I
will be grateful if anyone can give me a hint or direct me to a reference.
As we know PowerPC use JTAG to debug CPU, which implements a Boundary-Scan
mechanism. It can manipulate any input/output signals of the
Hi,
When PQII FCC Ethernet runs under heavy tx load(such as using NetPIPE to
measure network performance), you may observe memory leak. Eventually
makes system crash. I digged into this problem and found that 2.6.7
don't have this problem. I pulled the fix to 2.4.x, and generated patch
(for
Hi
I am confused about the maintaining mechanism of kernel.org tree and linuxppc
tree. How a patch goes into linuxppc tree? And how patch from linuxppc tree
goes into kernel.org tree? Is there any patch that goes directly into
kernel.org tree? Who are the decision makers of merging a patch
41 matches
Mail list logo
