On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:02:50PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Right. Though.. running something like ptp4l on the same connection
> could be problematic if the applications aren't working together
> because most hardware supports a single request at once,
I wouldn't say "most". Surely some
Hi,
Miroslav Lichvar writes:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:37:38AM +, Eric Decker wrote:
>> If the timestamp is available in less than the timeout (5ms) will it still
>> wait for the timeout, or continue processing after the timestamp is received?
>
> The poll() call is waiting for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Miroslav Lichvar
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 12:35 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: Eric Decker ; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Increase the default
> tx_timestamp_timeout
> to 5
>
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 07:35:25PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > As a future improvement, maybe it could be adaptive, e.g. once in a
> > while try waiting much longer and if that doesn't give a timestamp
> > stick to a shorter interval. That is, try to detect when the hardware
> > is not able
