On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:59:57PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:15:59PM +0200, Erez wrote:
>
> > And we can change CC to
> > CC ?= ...
> >
> > In case CC comes from the build, like in Yocto and Debian.
>
> Nah, build systems that don't want to use gcc can and should
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:24:51PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Newer compilers complain about missing signatures for stncpy as said in
> subject.
Well, the why not state which compiler was used, and also share the
warning output?
Thanks,
Richard
___
Lin
On Fri, 20 Oct, 2023 12:47:39 -0700 Richard Cochran
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:50:20PM +0100, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> From: Khem Raj
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
>> ---
>> interface.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/interface.c b/interface.c
>> index 292
> On 20 Oct 2023, at 16:57, Erez wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Your statement is correct, but not the implementation.
> You need to export CC from the makefile, to get
> CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
> Value.
> In your patch CC may have a different value.
>
> I would use:
> "
> CC := $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
> expor
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:15:59PM +0200, Erez wrote:
> And we can change CC to
> CC ?= ...
>
> In case CC comes from the build, like in Yocto and Debian.
Nah, build systems that don't want to use gcc can and should dial what
they want on the command line:
make CC=abcxyz
See:
https://ww
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:15:59PM +0200, Erez wrote:
> How about
> $(shell CC=${CC} ./incdefs.sh)
but using makefile $(CC) and not shell script ${CC}
Thanks,
Richard
___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:50:20PM +0100, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> From: Khem Raj
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
> interface.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/interface.c b/interface.c
> index 29229ad6f53d..9a83c36933e7 100644
> --- a/interface.c
> +++ b/interface.c
>
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:35, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>
>
> > On 20 Oct 2023, at 16:57, Erez wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your statement is correct, but not the implementation.
> > You need to export CC from the makefile, to get
> > CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
> > Value.
> > In your patch CC may have a
Hi,
Your statement is correct, but not the implementation.
You need to export CC from the makefile, to get
CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
Value.
In your patch CC may have a different value.
I would use:
"
CC *:*= $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
export CC
"
Yes assign with ":=", see
https://www.gnu.org/software/ma
