Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-29 Thread Richard Cochran
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Maciek Machnikowski wrote: > Is it still possible to get those 2 patches into 4.0? Yes. Thanks, Richard ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-26 Thread Maciek Machnikowski
On 4/19/2023 11:43 AM, Maciek Machnikowski wrote: > On 4/17/2023 4:34 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:07:10AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> >>> As for the 4.0 release, can you please have a look at this bug fix? >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxptp-devel@lists.s

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-19 Thread Maciek Machnikowski
On 4/17/2023 4:34 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:07:10AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > >> As for the 4.0 release, can you please have a look at this bug fix? >> https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06420.html > > +1 > Can we also get t

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-17 Thread Richard Cochran
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:07:10AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > As for the 4.0 release, can you please have a look at this bug fix? > https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06420.html +1 ___ Linuxptp-devel mailing lis

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:50:35AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 09:57:52PM -0400, Vincent Cheng wrote: > > Compile issue after applying patch against master commit: > > > > commit 60d829b102be9b8b13357a0f7a93f3e02d44b4ce > > Author: Maciek Machnikowski > > Date:

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-17 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 05:29:32PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > Based on Erez's review, I expanded Christopher's patch to remove the > control field codes completely. I've tested this with the following > hardware, and nothing broke: > > Intel I210 > Intel X550T > LabX Titanium 411 AVB switch

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-17 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 09:57:52PM -0400, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Compile issue after applying patch against master commit: > > commit 60d829b102be9b8b13357a0f7a93f3e02d44b4ce > Author: Maciek Machnikowski > Date: Tue Apr 11 15:16:47 2023 +0200 > > --- > port.c: In function ‘port_

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-15 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 05:29:32PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > Based on Erez's review, I expanded Christopher's patch to remove the > control field codes completely. I've tested this with the following > hardware, and nothing broke: > > Intel I210 > Intel X550T > LabX Titanium 411 AVB switch

[Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Last (?) patch before version 4 release

2023-04-15 Thread Richard Cochran
Based on Erez's review, I expanded Christopher's patch to remove the control field codes completely. I've tested this with the following hardware, and nothing broke: Intel I210 Intel X550T LabX Titanium 411 AVB switch Please give this a try with your favorite hardware time stamping device. I'd